<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney&#8217;s 47% Fiasco Fuels MSNBC Ratings Rout For Maddow, O&#8217;Donnell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044</link>
	<description>The Internet&#039;s Chronicle of Media Decay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044&#038;cpage=1#comment-106198</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044#comment-106198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, besides the misspelling of Republican, you made one other error in your post. Fox doesn&#039;t repeat Republican talking points; Republicans repeat Fox talking points. It may seem like a minor point, but if you let it roll around in your head you will realize the deep implications of this. Let&#039;s not forget the words of David Frum: 

Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us, and now we are discovering we work for Fox]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, besides the misspelling of Republican, you made one other error in your post. Fox doesn&#8217;t repeat Republican talking points; Republicans repeat Fox talking points. It may seem like a minor point, but if you let it roll around in your head you will realize the deep implications of this. Let&#8217;s not forget the words of David Frum: </p>
<p>Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us, and now we are discovering we work for Fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044&#038;cpage=1#comment-106193</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044#comment-106193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone who watches Fox and tunes into MSNBC and gives Maddow and her colleauges a chance, they will see how she delivers her arguments logically. Her arguments are supported by truthful premises and her conclusions are therefore hard to refute if you listen to her with objectivity. Unlike Fox, who simply repeats repubican talking points with no or very little basis in fact. They simply give their opinions backed up by nothing. It&#039;s true because they say it is true. Obama is this or he is that because this particular expert we have in front of the camera, who in reality is a paid Fox contributor, says so. Fox is getting old(literally according to their ratings demographics) and many of the American people are on to them and are finding their fake journalism unacceptable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone who watches Fox and tunes into MSNBC and gives Maddow and her colleauges a chance, they will see how she delivers her arguments logically. Her arguments are supported by truthful premises and her conclusions are therefore hard to refute if you listen to her with objectivity. Unlike Fox, who simply repeats repubican talking points with no or very little basis in fact. They simply give their opinions backed up by nothing. It&#8217;s true because they say it is true. Obama is this or he is that because this particular expert we have in front of the camera, who in reality is a paid Fox contributor, says so. Fox is getting old(literally according to their ratings demographics) and many of the American people are on to them and are finding their fake journalism unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newsmediabd.com</title>
		<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044&#038;cpage=1#comment-106166</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsmediabd.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044#comment-106166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it&#039;s time to be happy. I&#039;ve read this submit and if I may just I desire to recommend you some interesting things or tips. Perhaps you could write next articles relating to this article. I wish to learn more things about it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it&#8217;s time to be happy. I&#8217;ve read this submit and if I may just I desire to recommend you some interesting things or tips. Perhaps you could write next articles relating to this article. I wish to learn more things about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044&#038;cpage=1#comment-106133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044#comment-106133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. Ed&#039;s tone is somewhat harsh. He could use someone to smooth the program&#039;s tone and expand its scope beyond labor issues (which are important, but mot the only thing).

And definitely they should replay those Saturday shows at times when people are actually awake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Ed&#8217;s tone is somewhat harsh. He could use someone to smooth the program&#8217;s tone and expand its scope beyond labor issues (which are important, but mot the only thing).</p>
<p>And definitely they should replay those Saturday shows at times when people are actually awake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Dallman</title>
		<link>http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044&#038;cpage=1#comment-106130</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Dallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=8044#comment-106130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see Weiner &quot;have a shot&quot; (pun intended)on MSNBC.  Also agree Ed is getting a little stale.  He great on union issues but the co-host suggestion has possibilities.  I would also like to see Chris Hayes &amp; MHP weekend shows repeated later in the day on Saturday &amp; Sunday.  I can do with less &quot;Lock-Up&quot; and more indepth analysis.  MSNBC is definitely partisan but they do their homework.  CNN and major network news organizations should take a few lessons from them on extensive coverage of an issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see Weiner &#8220;have a shot&#8221; (pun intended)on MSNBC.  Also agree Ed is getting a little stale.  He great on union issues but the co-host suggestion has possibilities.  I would also like to see Chris Hayes &amp; MHP weekend shows repeated later in the day on Saturday &amp; Sunday.  I can do with less &#8220;Lock-Up&#8221; and more indepth analysis.  MSNBC is definitely partisan but they do their homework.  CNN and major network news organizations should take a few lessons from them on extensive coverage of an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
