The Republican’s Dr. Strangelove Promotes Book By Nazi Sympathizer On Fox News

In the most recent polling of Republican voters, their top choices for president almost always include Dr. Ben Carson, the neurosurgeon-turned-Fox News pundit who viscerally hates President Obama and advocates Christian supremacy in America.

Carson appeared on Megyn Kelly’s Fox News program last night to warn that the United States is “going down the tubes” like the great empires of the past because we have “become enamored of sports and entertainment,” and have “lost our moral compass.” This downward spiral, Carson says, is an extremely dangerous situation that threatens to subject America to the same dreadful fate as previous historical dynasties like Greece, Rome, and Britain.

Ben Carson

The segment was mostly a paper thin discourse on vague apocalyptic generalities that provided scant insight into anything other than Carson’s embarrassingly poor grasp of history and government. His main points were cliched right-wing admonitions against progressivism and straying from Christian faith. And in the midst of this harangue, Carson made a note of the risks of divisiveness:

Kelly: To what extent do you feel divisiveness is playing a role in what we’re seeing right now?
Carson: It’s playing an extremely large role in what we are doing.

In what “WE” are doing? That was certainly a clumsy phrasing that Carson would probably like to retract. However, it is also ironically truthful. For the better part of the eight minute segment Carson was fiercely divisive, referring to his ideological foes as neo-Marxists, specifically aligning them with Marx, Lenin, and one of the right’s favorite bogeymen, Saul Alinsky. Which is why his unintended admission that divisiveness plays a large role in what “WE” are doing rings true.

Even Kelly observed that calling people neo-Marxists could cause others to view him as unpresidential and too extreme to ever be elected president. Carson’s response to that was to encourage viewers to do their own research. He then offered this as an example of the sort of troubling things they would find:

Carson: Number one rule of Saul Alinsky: You make the majority think that what they believe is no longer in vogue; that nobody with any intelligence thinks that way; and that the way you believe is the only way that intelligent people believe.

The only problem with that example is that it does not happen to be the number one rule of Saul Alinsky. Nor is it any other rule. It appears that Carson just made it up as it doesn’t even resemble any of the actual rules that Alinsky laid out in his book “Rules For Radicals”. Or, more likely, he adopted it from some disreputable source that he naively believed. [For reference I have included all of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals at the bottom of this post] But it wasn’t until Carson sought to buttress his criticism with additional girders of fringy philosophy that he went spinning off the rails entirely. And in the process he demonstrated how vulnerable he is to disreputable sources.

Carson: There was a guy who was a former CIA agent by the name of Cleon Skousen who wrote a book in 1958 called “The Naked Communist,” that laid out the whole agenda. You would think by reading it that it was written last year. Showing what they’re trying to do to American families, what they’re trying to do to our Judeo-Christian faith, what they’re doing to morality.

W. Cleon Skousen was a disgraced Mormon whackjob whom even the Mormon church repudiated. He was a rabid anti-communist who veered off into conspiracy theories and fabricated prophecy. His extreme views led him to support other contemporary opponents of communism, better known as Nazis. And for good measure, Carson shares his admiration of Skousen with another popular whackjob, Glenn Beck, who insisted that his followers read Skousen’s “The 5,000 Year Leap,” which Beck said was divinely inspired.

And so it has come to pass that Ben Carson is the darling of the Tea Party and other far-right dimwits. It is a strange love, so to speak, because despite having absolutely zero expertise in government, law, social sciences, public service, or any other study relevant to statecraft, the Republican base has embraced him and are striving mightily to persuade him to throw his hat in the ring for the presidency, a job for which he is profoundly unqualified.

Shameless self-promotion…
Get Fox Nation vs. Reality. Available now at Amazon.

But what is truly dumbfounding is that he isn’t much less qualified than many of the other prospective GOP candidates (Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio) or candidates past (Michele Bachmann, Donald Trump, Herman Cain, Sarah Palin). Scary, isn’t it?

From Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals:

  • Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.
  • Never go outside the expertise of your people.
  • Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.
  • Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
  • Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
  • A good tactic is one your people enjoy.
  • A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
  • Keep the pressure on. Never let up.
  • The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
  • The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
  • If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.
  • The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
  • Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
Advertisement:

10 thoughts on “The Republican’s Dr. Strangelove Promotes Book By Nazi Sympathizer On Fox News

  1. The Black Tea Loves Cream? Fox went out of it’s way to recruit a few that have become Traitors to their own Race.

    • I’m not a big follower of Fox or group of pundits – but exactly how has this guy become a traitor to his own race? What position does he take that could be considered bad for blacks? Honestly? Or is it just that as a successful black man – he can never take an opposing position to other black men – such as our president – must he blindly follow others just because he is of the same race.

      • but exactly how has this guy become a traitor to his own race? What position does he take that could be considered bad for blacks? Honestly?

        Dr. Carson has explained how his family directly benefited from government assistance programs while he was growing up. He credits them for lifting them up and affording him the opportunity for a decent education. However, now that Dr. Carson no longer needs such assistance, he believes that the very programs that enabled him to be something should be abolished.

        I would call that being a traitor to your race and being a hypocrite of the highest order.

        • Now that’s called threading the needle – I thought someone would need to patronize or insult the black population by saying they could never achieve anything without government programs and his (assuming that’s the issue) support for scaling them back was bad for that reason – excellent response. That of course is my position – the arguments in favor of these ridiculous programs are an amazing insult to any thinking human being – suggesting achievement is a result of government involvement for entire populations. I think we’ve come farther as a society than that. Good you pulled Philip Coleman out of the fire – I’m sure he couldn’t do as well.

  2. All of Saul Alinsky’s rules sound like the Republican/Tea Party Play Book as written by Dick Cheney.

    • The Government Killers never sleep? all that Matters is their stocks and bonds and No REGS!

  3. Personally, I would prefer to live in a godless society than a Christian theocracy. Maybe the good doctor would also care to discuss the untold miseries brought upon the human race in the name of Christianity?

    • NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION!

  4. The author of this article is obviously too stupid to understand the concept of irony. They bash Nazis, but defend Communists, even though Communists are more evil than Nazis and Communists killed far more people than the Nazis ever did.

    • I think you have a serious lack of reading comprehension and, if you’re defending the Nazi’s, a serious lack of understanding of the Holocaust. You have a right to express your opinion but calling the author stupid is not the way to win an argument.

Comments are closed.