The World Is On Fire: Ted Cruz Ignites The GOP Presidential Primary Season

Today marks the official start of the Republican Presidential primaries. First out of the Clown Car is freshman Texas senator Ted Cruz. As the first candidate to announce, Cruz is bucking the odds where electoral history records that no candidate who announced first has prevailed since 1952.

Ted Cruz

Cruz has bigger problems than a statistical curse. His popularity in a large field of contenders is decidedly weak. Coming in at eighth in the RealClear polling average, he is trailing outliers like Ben Carson and Chris Christie. And he is also near the bottom of the pack in a match-up against Hillary Clinton, losing to the prospective Democratic nominee by double digits.

The only constituency where Cruz is viewed favorably is the Glenn Beck/Tea Party crowd of dimwitted right-wing extremists. There aren’t enough of them to get Cruz to the White House. Hell, there aren’t enough of them to get Cruz to the House of Pies.

He’s a candidate without a portfolio. After all the harping by conservatives about whether President Obama was lacking experience when he ran for president, they are now being asked to support someone with even less experience. Although both were senators for only two years when they ran, Obama spent seven years in the Illinois state legislature prior to becoming a senator. What’s more, the same crackpots who insisted that Obama was not qualified to be president due to their delusional claims about his birthplace and communist upbringing, don’t seem to have any problem with Cruz, who was born in Canada to a Cuban father who fought alongside Fidel Castro.

The irascible Cruz’s tenure in the senate is fraught with controversy. Even his Republican colleagues were embarrassed by his attempt to shut down the government with a filibuster that featured a reading of “Green Eggs and Ham.” Likewise, Cruz angered his peers when his greenhorn maneuvering permitted Democratic Leader Harry Reid to get confirmations for two dozen Obama appointees that would have otherwise been bypassed.

On policy Cruz is as far to the right as one can get. He has never seen a war or military escalation he didn’t love. He is a science denier who rejects both Climate Change and evolution. He opposes immigration reform, marriage equality, raising the minimum wage, and abortion even in cases of rape or incest. He voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. He would demolish the wall of separation between church and state. He has made repealing “every word” of the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare) a centerpiece of his platform, despite the fact that it would explode the deficit and cause millions of Americans to lose their health insurance.

In his public statements, Cruz has been less than credible. Aside from having an overtly hostile personality that disrespects his opponents and their offices, his track record for honesty is dismal. PolitiFact has rated two-thirds of his statements as “Mostly False” or worse. That’s a lower percentage than all of the other main GOP candidates.

The good news (or bad news depending on your appreciation of political comedy and/or absurdist performance art) is that Cruz has almost no chance of winning the Republican nomination. He may rise to the top of the heap briefly as almost all GOP contenders do (see Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Donald Trump). But he cannot prevail over the more establishment oriented Jeb Bush or Scott Walker. He is the poster boy for wingnut conservatism. And he is bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, although he is not the lone Republican with that distinction. Walker, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul all appeared with Cruz at a recent Koch-fest to plead for their anointing. But it was Cruz who went the extra distance by praising his hosts becuase they “stood up for free-market principles and endured vilification.”

News Corpse Presents: The ALL NEW 2nd volume of
Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance.
Available now at Amazon.

In his announcement speech, Cruz hit on all of the cliche right-wing drool enhancers: America uber-alles, God-centered government, and Ayn Randian self-interest in all matters. He spun his personal biography as a child of immigrants, whom he hopes to prevent from achieving the same American dream that his family enjoyed.

He basked in the warm reception he received from the captive audience at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University where the announcement took place. [Update: The students were required to attend or be fined] It was an appropriate venue for the sanctimonious son of a fire-and-brimstone evangelical preacher who truly believes that the world is on fire already. Which may explain his campaign logo: An upside flag that is aflame. And his announcement PR continues tonight on (where else) Fox News as he canoodles with Sean Hannity for the full hour.

Advertisement:

4 thoughts on “The World Is On Fire: Ted Cruz Ignites The GOP Presidential Primary Season

  1. So . . . . .he’s a nightmare lunatic.

  2. Adding: that the attendance at Falwell U. was mandatory should be noted.

    Paragraph 5 : “shutdown” should be two separate words. As one it indicates a noun while you intended it as a verb and an adverb.

  3. This paragraph is such a joke:

    “He’s a candidate without a portfolio. After all the harping by conservatives about whether President Obama was lacking experience when he ran for president, they are now being asked to support someone with even less experience. Although both were senators for only two years when they ran, Obama spent seven years in the Illinois state legislature prior to becoming a senator. What’s more, the same crackpots who insisted that Obama was not qualified to be president due to their delusional claims about his birthplace and communist upbringing, don’t seem to have any problem with Cruz, who was born in Canada to a Cuban father who fought alongside Fidel Castro.”

    “Even less experience????” I’m not interested in anyone from Texas being president again – but holy crap. How you can blind yourself to reality and see your idol BHO different than this guy is so f*&^%ing amazing. There is absolutely NO difference between these guys with respect to experience when starting their runs. You must live in a permanent fantasy land complete with unicorns and rainbows. Being in a state legislature is hardly experience to be president – being governor – that’s more like it. Neither of these guys stands apart – except BHO has shown how not having been a chief executive of anything, including a state, really does matter. His incompetence has made it more difficult for this type of guy to be supported – so Ted Cruz has a bigger problem than I think he knows.

    • You always, and I mean always either ignore or aren’t able to comprehend the jist of the post you’re commenting on.

      In this case, you may or may not be capable of following the rest of the post, but the paragraph you’ve chosen to comment on shows how blind to reality one can get.

      First off, no one is going to argue (and I didn’t see where Mark did either) that having seven more years in a state legislature gives anyone an obvious leg up to leadership skills. I think, as most people do, it’s a good start and is generally where most politicians start their careers but not as significant as say the governorship in terms of national office. There are exceptions: Reagan was a governor AND an actor and W was a governor. Didn’t seem to help them.

      Obama wasn’t a gov and will be remembered by non-wing-nuts as one of the better Presidents and the right person for the job/times. You foolishly argue to the contrary all the time; we get it. Your hatred of the man blinds you to the reality.

      This paragraph you chose is only a small bit of the post but identifies the hypocrisy of you and your party and you blew it all up by talking about being blind to reality and in doing so, cast even more light on the reality of right wing-nut hypocrisy. The wing-nuts will support Cruz’s lack of experience but wouldn’t tolerate Obama’s.

      And your attempt at a comparison of the President and Cruz is weak. (“NO difference”? I suspect the mention of seven more years is what you’re all butt hurt about. Why else would something that insignificant be the only thing you addressed?) The world recognizes the bona fides and credibility of this President even when the wing-nuts in this country are “blind to reality”. We also recognize that Cruz is not in the same league as Obama, is not ever going to be ready for prime time and isn’t running for higher office. He just wants your money and to be seen as something he’s not…leadership material. He’s just a bomb thrower, a divider and just wants attention. He gets it from the wing-nuts and wing-nuts only. Just check with your other party members to see how he is viewed.

      Bring a better argument next time. Or bring any argument, just not the same old weak sauce.

Comments are closed.