{"id":10798,"date":"2013-10-28T09:13:29","date_gmt":"2013-10-28T16:13:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=10798"},"modified":"2015-06-16T16:13:17","modified_gmt":"2015-06-16T23:13:17","slug":"the-tea-party-is-over-according-to-bill-oreilly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=10798","title":{"rendered":"The Tea Party Is Over According To – Bill O’Reilly!"},"content":{"rendered":"

The astroturf fraud known as the Tea Party was literally invented<\/a> by a cabal of uber-rightist millionaires and corporations with interests in tobacco and oil. The prime movers were the Koch brothers, who transited from their father’s John Birch Society to their own front groups, Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks.<\/p>\n

The financial firepower of these entities, however, was still not enough to elevate the Tea Party “movement.”<\/em> It required an aggressive media sponsor to flood the news zone with faux-populist themes and give birth to the puppetized pundits and politicians who would carry the message. For that mission Fox News was all too ready to volunteer and even went to great lengths to brand the Tea Party as a Fox News subsidiary with promos touting their “FNC Tax Day Tea Parties.”<\/em> There can be no doubt that without Fox News there would be no Tea Party.<\/p>\n

\"Bill
\nBe Sure To \u201cLIKE\u201d News Corpse On Facebook<\/a><\/center>
\n<\/p>\n

That makes the new column<\/a> by Fox’s star attraction, Bill O’Reilly, all the more startling. His own headline reads “Is the Tea Party Over?”<\/em> And by the end he answers the question with a resounding “Yes.”<\/em><\/p>\n

“The only way the Tea Party can resurrect itself is for it to coalesce around a strong leader. There has to be a central message delivered by someone with charisma, a person who is reasonable and persuasive. The movement has been damaged both inside and out. Only a very intense public relations campaign will turn the tide.<\/p>\n

“I don’t think that will happen. It would take millions of dollars in TV ads and organizational infrastructure for the Tea Party to negate the national media’s contempt. And that kind of big money operation goes directly against what the Tea Party people want to be – a citizen movement that operates independent of party structure.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

O’Reilly’s opinion, in short, is that “The only way the Tea Party can resurrect itself is for it to coalesce around a strong leader,”<\/em> and “I don’t think that will happen.”<\/em> O’Reilly is throwing recent Tea Darlings like Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul under the bus, along with baggers like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann who are already there.<\/p>\n

I’m not going to argue with O’Reilly’s conclusion because the Tea Party has always been a constructed reality. It never existed outside of the power structure of the Republican elite. There were no Tea Party candidates, conventions, voter registrations, or platforms. They were all Republican politicians, voters, and policies. However, there is much to disagree with in the path to O’Reilly’s eulogy.<\/p>\n

First of all, O’Reilly’s contention that the Tea Party’s problem is a lack of leaders can only be taken seriously by a deaf and blind pundit who lives in a Himalayan cave. There are many who do, and who aspire to, lead the phony parade. Their problem is that they advocate a broadly unpopular set of policies that the American people emphatically reject. People like Ted Cruz and Sarah Palin have favorable ratings that scrape the sea floor at record low levels, as does the Tea Party itself. The Tea Party doesn’t have a public relations problem, it has an agenda problem.<\/p>\n

Secondly, O’Reilly seems to think that there hasn’t been enough money thrown at advancing the Tea Party mission. When he said that it “would take millions of dollars”<\/em> which conflicts with the Tea Party’s alleged aversion to “big money operations,”<\/em> he ignores the fact that the Tea Party has always been a big money operation financed with hundreds of millions of dollars by everyone from the Koch brothers to Karl Rove to the Republican National Committee, and dozens of mysterious Super PACs that keep their donor’s identities secret.<\/p>\n

The central theme of O’Reilly’s column is that the Tea Party’s woes are all the result of the contempt of the media (as opposed to the contempt of the people). He says that “the Tea Party finds itself with an image problem and there are two primary reasons why.”<\/em> The first of O’Reilly’s gripes is with the media, who he says “is at odds with Tea Party beliefs,”<\/em> and that “demonizes the Tea Party all day long calling it racist, stupid and even worse – unsophisticated!”<\/em> It’s telling that O’Reilly thinks it’s worse to be called unsophisticated than racist or stupid. But he may be onto something because, based on their behavior, most Tea Partiers don’t seem to be concerned about public displays of racism or stupidity.<\/p>\n