{"id":10905,"date":"2013-11-16T11:35:25","date_gmt":"2013-11-16T19:35:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=10905"},"modified":"2013-11-16T11:35:25","modified_gmt":"2013-11-16T19:35:25","slug":"rachel-maddow-exposes-gop-obstructionism-while-media-is-shocked-by-democratic-bipartisanship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=10905","title":{"rendered":"Rachel Maddow Exposes GOP Obstructionism, While Media Is Shocked By Democratic Bipartisanship"},"content":{"rendered":"

Conservatives have been hammering at President Obama for having promised that anyone who wants to keep their health care plan would be able to do so after the implementation of ObamaCare. That turned out not to be entirely accurate. Although, for the most part, those who would lose access to their existing plans would gain access to better, cheaper plans, there would be a few for whom that would not hold true.<\/p>\n

Republicans took great joy in blasting the President over this anomaly that probably affects only 3% of the population, dismissing the fact that ObamaCare will benefit tens of millions more than it allegedly harms. They demanded that he take remedial action to permit people who have plans they like to keep them. So Obama announced that he would do just that, which led Republicans to criticize him for doing precisely what they asked.<\/p>\n

Not content to take “yes”<\/em> for an answer, the House GOP drafted legislation to fix the problem. However, rather than simply permiting people to keep their current plans, the GOP bill would allow insurance companies to sell those junk plans to new customers who never had them to begin with. That would seriously endanger the viability of ObamaCare because it take people out of the larger pool of covered individuals necessary to make the program work.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, the bill passed in the House with 39 Democrats voting along with the majority Republicans. The media response to this act of bipartisanship was surprise and characterizations of Democratic defiance and betrayal. It is exactly that sort of closed-mindedness that produces the unprecedented dysfunction we currently see in Congress. Any measure of cooperation is regarded as treason rather than teamwork. And that is also the guiding principle of the modern Tea Party Republican junta.<\/p>\n

\"Fox
\n

Be Sure To \u201cLIKE\u201d News Corpse On Facebook<\/a><\/center><\/p>\n

While Democrats behave in a manner that is consistent with advancing the country’s best interests, Republicans are fixated on crushing the Democrats. Even legislation that enjoys broad support by majorities of the American people is snubbed the GOP simply because it is also supported by Democrats or the President. Rachel Maddow illustrated this brilliantly on Friday’s program (video below).<\/p>\n

The examples that Maddow highlighted were all issues that have extraordinarily wide support by the American public. From background checks on gun purchases, to immigration reform, to ending discrimination against gays, to raising the minimum wage, these are all issues that are backed by majorities of Democrats, independents, and even Republicans. But the GOP in Congress refuses to even bring these bills up for a vote, even though their own constituents want them to do so.<\/p>\n

\"Rachel<\/p>\n

This makes the media reaction to Democrats behaving bipartisanly all the more disturbing. It’s as if they prefer the sort of hostility that is routinely exhibited by Republican and Tea Party extremists. And of course, that is precisely the problem. The media does prefer open battling and distrust because it serves its purpose both for manufacturing the sort of drama that generates ratings, and for obstructing national policies that their corporate boards oppose. Here is a sampling of the reporting that followed the House vote:<\/p>\n