{"id":1369,"date":"2009-08-18T14:25:24","date_gmt":"2009-08-18T21:25:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=1369"},"modified":"2009-08-18T14:53:16","modified_gmt":"2009-08-18T21:53:16","slug":"the-idiots-of-fox-news-garrett-sammon-and-oreilly-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=1369","title":{"rendered":"The Idiots Of Fox News: Garrett, Sammon, And O’Reilly Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"

I know, the headline is redundant. What’s more, this list is far from comprehensive. It is just intended to spotlight a few recent examples. I couldn’t possibly keep up with them all.<\/p>\n

For the last Week, Major Garrett has been making it abundantly clear that he is a moron<\/a>. He doesn’t seem to understand how the Internet works and he thinks that emails received by some Fox News viewers is a more important issue than health care or Afghanistan or Iran or anything else on the nation’s agenda.<\/p>\n

Now a Fox colleague has joined him and may have surpassed his idiocy. Bill Sammon<\/a>, VP and Washington managing editor, appeared this morning and was interviewed by anchor Trace Gallagher (who delivers every report as if you are a kindergartner – which may be appropriate for Fox viewers). In his attempt to prolong the manufactured pseudo-scandal over emails, Sammon explained that the White House improperly collected email data (it did not) and that it should not be retained. He then went on to speculate that the administration might destroy the alleged data and that, if they did, they would be in violation of the Presidential Records Act. So Sammon was criticizing the White House for both keeping the data and not keeping the data (he later acknowledged this paradox, but the damage he intended was done). It’s the perfect Fox News perspective. No matter what the President does, it’s wrong.<\/p>\n

Perennial Fox News idiot, Bill O’Reilly had this to say<\/a> yesterday on the President’s health care proposal:<\/p>\n

“‘Talking Points’ watched President Obama in Colorado on Saturday, and once again I had no idea what the president was talking about. He went on and on about all kinds of stuff that seemingly only he understands. It’s kind of like a poltergeist. He can see it; nobody else can.”<\/span><\/p>\n

“So here’s the deal. If President Obama wants more fairness in the health care industry, he has to come up with five bullet points that even I can understand. Five things that clearly tell us what Obamacare would do.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

First of all, isn’t it cute that O’Reilly refers to himself as “Talking Points,”<\/em> some kind of disembodied concept that watched the President? But more to the point, he admitted that he is an idiot who has “no idea what the president was talking about.”<\/em> I suppose we should respect his honesty for confessing to his inferior comprehension skills. But he goes on to complain that Obama’s plan isn’t simple enough for him and that it should have five bullet points to make it understandable to someone of his deficient mental capacity. Unfortunately, the White House ignored O’Reilly’s advice and published eight bullet points<\/a>:<\/p>\n