{"id":20143,"date":"2014-08-08T13:57:50","date_gmt":"2014-08-08T20:57:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=20143"},"modified":"2014-08-08T13:57:50","modified_gmt":"2014-08-08T20:57:50","slug":"operation-no-name-or-whatever-obama-does-is-wrong-the-isis-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=20143","title":{"rendered":"Operation No Name – Or Whatever Obama Does Is Wrong: The ISIS Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Conservative critics of President Obama wasted no time in complaining about what they said was his failure to respond to the humanitarian crisis in Iraq where thousands of refugees are trapped on a mountain by ISIS militants. Never mind that only a few days had transpired since learning of the impending tragedy, the armchair generals in Congress and on Fox News had fully assessed the situation and were ready to fly off the handle.<\/p>\n

The Senate’s preeminent news video hog, John McCain, blasted the administration for taking \u201cno discernible action.\u201d<\/em> GOP Rep. Chris Smith said that “The president\u2019s indifference is both numbing and enabling.”<\/em> His colleague Frank Wolf joined in saying that “The administration has done nothing.”<\/em> It was a steady chorus of complaints from the Republican caucus. That is, until Obama took decisive action within a few hours of the GOP outcry. From that point on the wingnuts criticized the President for doing something.<\/p>\n

Among the complaints by the perennial war hawks are that Obama screwed up by removing American troops from Iraq in 2011 (which was actually Bush’s timetable); that Obama failed to secure a “status of forces”<\/em> agreement (which actually Bush failed to secure); that Obama didn’t immediately strike ISIS when it first began its campaign, and generally that Obama has been detached, distracted, and even hostile to American interests. In short, the right blames Obama for everything that can possibily go wrong. They blame him for the acts of terrorists (rather than, you know, the terrorists). They blame him for doing what the American people want (which is to keep American ground troops out of Iraq). They blame him for Al Qaeda, for ebola, and for ants at picnics.<\/p>\n

And the latest crackpot criticism of Obama is that his Defense Department has not assigned a name to the mission currently in progress. Seriously. There is no name. IMPEACH!<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Fox<\/p>\n

Shameless self-promotion…
\nGet Fox Nation vs. Reality. Available now at Amazon.<\/a><\/p>\n

What could the President be thinking by failing to execute this critical function of his role as Commander-in-Chief? It is an insult to the soldiers risking their lives in defense of the American Dream that they don’t have a title to which they can refer. How can they be expected to fulfill their mission if they don’t know what to call it? If the President doesn’t correct this atrocious oversight expeditiously he will go down in history as a traitor to his nation.<\/p>\n

There is another possibility that may have escaped the notice of the brilliant war strategists on the right. Perhaps Obama has named the mission “No Name.”<\/em> This would be an ingenious tactic to confuse the enemy. They would never be able to respond to a ghostly maneuver that they couldn’t identify with a label. Operation No Name<\/strong> may be the shrewdest military gambit in modern times. And it may have been inspired by a uniquely patriotic piece of our cultural history:<\/p>\n

I’ve Been Through The Desert On A Horse\/Mission With No Name – by America!<\/strong><\/p>\n