{"id":22371,"date":"2014-11-13T03:18:41","date_gmt":"2014-11-13T11:18:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=22371"},"modified":"2014-11-13T03:18:41","modified_gmt":"2014-11-13T11:18:41","slug":"fortunate-son-burn-to-fox-news-an-anti-war-song-is-anti-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=22371","title":{"rendered":"Fortunate Son Burn: To Fox News An Anti-War Song Is Anti-Military"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a never ending quest to find artificially negative themes with which to provoke their mentally unstable viewers into irrational panics, Fox News latched onto the broadcast of an HBO tribute to veterans on Veterans Day. The atrocity that caught their attention was a performance by Bruce Springsteen, Dave Grohl, and Zac Brown, of the classic 1960’s song “Fortunate Son”<\/em> by Creedence Clearwater Revival. And it was literally, according to Fox, an outrage.<\/p>\n

\"Fox<\/p>\n

What ruffled Fox’s chickenhawk feathers was their addled interpretation of the song as anti-military. And what made the song anti-military was that it was allegedly anti-war. Fox pounded that view into their audience all day with segments on Fox & Friends, where co-host Anna Kooiman said it was “a slap in the face”<\/em> to veterans; on Outnumbered, where it was characterized as an “outrage;”<\/em> and on The Five, where co-host Eric Bolling called the choice of material “a mistake.”<\/em><\/p>\n

First of all, the song is not anti-war. It is anti-elitist privileged classes that exempt themselves from the burdens of society. It explicitly criticizes the rich and powerful who vote themselves tax cuts and shield their kids from the dirty business of defending the freedom that they exploit. The song’s title should make it obvious enough that the hacks on Fox wouldn’t need to struggle to figure it out.<\/p>\n

Secondly, even if the song were anti-war, that does not translate to anti-military in any sane person’s mind. Some of the most anti-war people you will ever meet are soldiers and veterans. This makes perfect sense because they are the ones most affected by war. When military conflicts are averted they remain safe and their families are spared the anxiety of separation and potential tragedy.<\/p>\n

For Fox to contrive an anti-military spin to the concept of anti-war requires them to adopt the view that in order to be pro-military you must be pro-war. That is ludicrous on its face. In fact, the opposite is true. Anyone who is truly pro-military wants every possible measure taken to avoid sending America’s sons and daughters into battle. Once in battle, support for the military is expressed by wishes for the safe completion of their mission and return home. No supporter of the military also supports an enduring war.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, the confused anti-military viewpoint of the talking head set is precisely what Fox News wants to project to their dimwitted audience. They obviously have no grasp of the real nature of patriotism, and they are even worse when they pretend to be rock music critics.<\/p>\n

For your entertainment pleasure, here is the awesome version of Fortunate Son performed at the Concert for Valor:<\/p>\n