{"id":33985,"date":"2017-02-24T17:23:24","date_gmt":"2017-02-25T01:23:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=33985"},"modified":"2017-02-24T17:25:28","modified_gmt":"2017-02-25T01:25:28","slug":"trumps-cpac-speech-narcissistic-blather-and-incoherent-attacks-on-the-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=33985","title":{"rendered":"Trump’s CPAC Speech: Narcissistic Blather And Incoherent Attacks On The Media"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) for 2017 is currently in progress. And on Friday it featured its star attraction, President Donald Trump. Trump could have stayed home and just delivered a video from any of his campaign stump speeches. His speech (transcript<\/a><\/strong>) was entirely devoid of any new thoughts he might have had after being president for a month. Of course, that’s presuming he ever has any new thoughts.<\/p>\n

\"Donald
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

Trump began with a familiar topic: himself. He rambled aimlessly for several minutes about whether he had just received a standing ovation. And of course he rattled off false statistics about his allegedly record setting electoral achievements. Then, after a few minutes of right-wing boot-licking, he bragged about how much he is loved by the CPAC crowd. One of his boasts concerned how well he did in polling after his previous CPAC speeches. The truth, however, is that he lost<\/a><\/strong> most of the CPAC straw polls bigly. In 2015 he registered a pathetic eigth place finish with only 3.5 percent of the vote. Last year, with the presidential campaign in full swing, he finished a distant third with 15 percent.<\/p>\n

Trump did manage to stuff in the usual conservative issues and wingnut applause lines. He promised to fight terrorism, repeal ObamaCare, deport Mexicans, cut taxes, and build a wall. And he would preside over the biggest military buildup ever, and spend a trillion dollars on infrastructure, while eliminating the national debt. As usual, he provided no details as to how he would accomplish any of those fantastical goals.<\/p>\n

Much of the speech was focused on his infamous hatred for the free press, or as he calls it, the “fake news.”<\/em> He opened this part of his address with a manic declaration. “I want you all to know,”<\/em> he ranted, “that we are fighting the fake news. It\u2019s fake. Phony. Fake.”<\/em> Then he elaborated:<\/p>\n

“A few days ago I called the fake news the enemy of the people. And they are. They are the enemy of the people. Because they have no sources, they just make \u2019em up when there are none. I saw one story recently where they said, ‘Nine people have confirmed.’ There\u2019re no nine people. I don\u2019t believe there was one or two people. Nine people. And I said, ‘Give me a break.’ Because I know the people, I know who they talk to. There were no nine people. But they say ‘nine people.’ And somebody reads it and they think, ‘Oh, nine people. They have nine sources.’ They make up sources.”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Indeed, Trump railed about the media as “the enemy of the American people.<\/a><\/strong>“<\/em> That’s a phrase that maligns the First Amendment, and has its roots in Mao’s China. But his mad ravings about the “nine sources”<\/em> is especially puzzling. That’s because he’s referring to a story in the Washington Post about his former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn. The Post reported<\/a><\/strong> that they had nine sources affirming that Flynn had inappropriate discussions with Russian agents during the campaign. As a result of that story, Trump fired Flynn. Is he now contending that he fired his top national security aide because of a fake story with no sources? Who knows? And it doesn’t get any more comprehensible from there:<\/p>\n

“They\u2019re very dishonest people. In fact, in covering my comments, the dishonest media did not explain that I called the fake news the enemy of the people. The fake news. They dropped off the word ‘fake.’ And all of a sudden the story became the media is the enemy. They take the word ‘fake’ out. And now I\u2019m saying, ‘Oh no, this is no good.’ But that\u2019s the way they are.” […]<\/strong><\/p>\n

“They shouldn\u2019t be allowed to use sources unless they use somebody\u2019s name. Let their name be put out there. Let their name be put out. ‘A source says that Donald Trump is a horrible, horrible human being.’ Let \u2019em say it to my face. Let there be no more sources.”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Huh? First of all, without any sources there wouldn’t be any stories. And anonymity is necessary at times when the source is threatened professionally, financially, or physically. And, of course, Trump’s administration has its own anonymous sources that pass information to the press. Will he identify them all now? The only part of that that made any sense was the part about him being a “horrible human being.”<\/em><\/p>\n

As for Trump’s assertion that he specified only fake news as the enemy of the people, he’s right. But his assertion that reports left that word out is nonsense. In most cases cases they quoted his tweet verbatim and showed it on screen or in print. Furthermore, his tweet accusing the media of fakery was pretty broadly stated. He explicitly cited the New York Times, NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN. Apparently, Trump regards only Fox News, Infowars, the National Enquirer, and Breitbart News as non-fake. And he still isn’t through:<\/p>\n

“They say that we can\u2019t criticize their dishonest coverage because of the First Amendment. You know, they always bring up the First Amendment. And I love the First Amendment; nobody loves it better than me. Nobody. I mean, who use it more than I do? […] So just in finishing, I say it doesn\u2019t represent the people. It doesn\u2019t tell the – never will represent the people. And we\u2019re going to do something about it because we have to go out and have to speak our minds and we have to be honest.”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Who ever said that he can’t criticize the media? Are the voices in his head shouting louder than the Fox News blowhards on his TV? And for someone who claims to appreciate the First Amendment, he has a funny way of showing it. Friday afternoon his press secretary explicitly banned<\/a><\/strong> several news organizations from an informal briefing. After admitting right-wing propaganda outfits like Breitbart and the One America News Network, Sean Spicer shut the door. He refused entry to CNN, the New York Times, Politico, The Hill, BuzzFeed, the Daily Mail, BBC, the Los Angeles Times, and the New York Daily News. This is in direct contradiction of a promise he made<\/a><\/strong> last December that he would “absolutely not”<\/em> ban any credentialed journalists. So much for fairness and transparency in the Trump press office.<\/p>\n

So just in finishing, WTF does Trump mean when he says that the media “doesn’t represent the people”<\/em> and that he’s “going to do something about it?”<\/em> What exactly does he have in mind? And does he think it’s the job of the president to make the media represent the people, as he defines it?<\/p>\n

This CPAC speech was another in long line of embarrassingly maniacal orations that have come to epitomize the Trumpian sermonizing. They are filled with lies, exaggerations, boasting, and malice toward many. And to the extent that they can be comprehended, they are almost entirely lacking in substance. Yet somehow, his glassy-eyed followers cheer wildly as if he said something that wasn’t gibberish. That may be the saddest – and scariest – part of the Era of Trump.<\/p>\n

\n

How Fox News Deceives and Controls Their Flock:
\nFox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance.<\/a>
\nAvailable now at Amazon.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n