{"id":50828,"date":"2021-09-30T12:23:16","date_gmt":"2021-09-30T19:23:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=50828"},"modified":"2021-09-30T12:23:16","modified_gmt":"2021-09-30T19:23:16","slug":"huh-trump-opposes-the-democratic-bills-because-they-will-elect-more-republicans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=50828","title":{"rendered":"HUH? Trump Opposes the Democratic Bills Because … They Will Elect More Republicans?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Democrats in Congress are battling with Republicans – and a couple of reticent Democrats – to pass a pair pf bills aimed at keeping the government from shutting down and defaulting on its debt. Republicans are demonstrating their customary hypocrisy with regard to the debt limit<\/a><\/strong>, and their blatant and reckless partisanship on funding for critical ongoing operations.<\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/p>\n

On Thursday morning there was some chatter in the press about agreements being reached to get the Continuing Resolution passed and keep the government open. But any signal that the government might function efficiently is an automatic trigger to Donald Trump, whose psychotic synapses force him into a perpetually hostile stance. Consequently, upon hearing the news, Trump had his spokes-shill, Liz Harrington (whose proxy Trump tweeting is violating Twitter’s rules<\/a><\/strong> against circumventing a ban), hammer out a couple of audaciously dishonest tweets in hopes of undermining the legislative progress.<\/p>\n

The first tweet<\/a><\/strong> insisted that “This bill must be opposed!\u201d<\/em> Trump’s reasons for opposition were based on his utterly fictional analysis of the bill, along with a swing at xenophobic fear mongering:<\/p>\n

“Snuck into the government funding bill, or CR, the Democrats are trying to pass, and just found, is unlimited money to random, unscreened, unvetted Afghan nationals. Republicans can’t let this happen. […] This is not a \u201cclean\u201d government funding bill. It\u2019s a major immigration rewrite that allows Biden to bring anyone he wants from Afghanistan for the next year\u2014no vetting, no screening, no security\u2014and fly them to your community.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Absolutely none of that is true. The only reference to Afghans<\/a><\/strong> is a clause that permits the federal government to continue operations in support of “individuals evacuated from Afghanistan.”<\/em> These are the allies who worked with the U.S. military during the twenty year war. They are the same people that Republicans and Fox News complained were being left behind. Now Trump is portraying them as dangerous foes being surreptitiously planted in “your community.”<\/em><\/p>\n

The second tweet<\/a><\/strong> also demanded that the bills be rejected. but this one took a more brazenly political posture:<\/p>\n

“If Democrats are able to piece together their huge tax hikes, called by another name, it will mean an additional 40 Republican seats in the House and at least a few additional Republican Senators in the U.S. Senate.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Without any warning, Trump appears to have changed the subject from the funding and debt ceiling bills, to the infrastructure bills. It is the reconciliation bill that contains a rollback of Trump’s prior tax scam that cut taxes for corporations and the wealthy. However, what is notable in his comment is his belief that those provisions are unpopular and would result in a red wave in the mid-term election next year.<\/p>\n

Let’s set aside the fact that the Democratic bills are overwhelmingly favored by broad majorities<\/a><\/strong> of voters. If Trump actually believed that passage of the Democratic agenda would result in Republicans retaking both houses of Congress, wouldn’t he welcome that? It would pave the way for his return to the White House in 2024, and then the GOP could enact whatever right-wing wet dreams they have.<\/p>\n

Obviously, Trump is rambling incoherently again. He has no idea how Congress works, or how the game of politics is played. His only strategy, no matter the circumstances, is to be virulently opposed to whatever his political foes favor. His one-note ideology can be summarized in the timeless words of one of America’s most renown statesmen…<\/p>\n