![\"Donald](\"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/Pix\/Trump\/trump-schiff-scared.jpg\")
<\/p>\nRep. Adam Schiff has long been a thorn in Donald Trump’s side. As the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, as the lead manager in Trump’s first impeachment, and now as a member of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th insurrection. Schiff has an insider’s experience of Trump’s anti-democratic crime spree, and a vast store of detailed knowledge and legal expertise.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Schiff is currently promoting his new book, “Midnight in Washington: How We Almost Lost Our Democracy and Still Could<\/a><\/strong>,”<\/em> that provides his unique perspective of Trump’s attempted coup. He appeared on ABC’s The View<\/em> Tuesday (video below)<\/em> to discuss the book and the harrowing events that it describes.<\/p>\n Part of the segment included questioning by guest co-host, Morgan Ortagus. She was a contributor at Fox News who Trump tapped to be a spokesperson for the State Department. From the beginning, Ortagus was intent on maligning Schiff. She led off with a line of questioning that insinuated he was responsible for falsehoods contained in the infamous Steele dossier. But Schiff wasn’t having it:<\/p>\n Ortagus:<\/strong> We know last week the main source of the [Steele] dossier was indicted by the FBI for lying about most of the key claims in that dossier. Do you have any reflections on your role in promoting this to the American people? But at the beginning of the Russia investigation I said that any allegations should be investigated. We couldn\u2019t have known, for example, people were lying to Christopher Steele. So it was proper to investigate them. And let\u2019s not forget what we learned in that investigation. We learned that the Trump campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was giving internal polling data, campaign polling data, to Russian intelligence while Russian intelligence was helping the Trump campaign.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n First of all, Igor Danchenko, one of the sources refenced in the dossier, was not indicted “for lying about most of the key claims in that dossier.”<\/em> The indictment<\/a><\/strong> was only for allegedly false statements about a couple of his sources of information. That said, Schiff correctly noted that anyone who lies to the FBI should be held accountable. Then he cites Trump associates who confessed to lying as examples. And he makes the point that Trump pardoned those admitted felons.<\/p>\n Schiff continued with a reminder of the crimes that Trump’s cohorts, including his campaign chairman Paul Manafort, were found guilty of. And he didn’t let Trump off the hook for requesting and receiving Russian campaign help. That led to Ortagus actually accusing Schiff of “spread[ing] Russian disinformation.”<\/em> To which Schiff replied…<\/p>\n Schiff:<\/strong> Well, I completely disagree with your premise. It\u2019s one thing to say that allegations should be investigated, and they were. It\u2019s another to say that we should have foreseen in advance that some people were lying to Christopher Steele, which is impossible, of course, to do. But let\u2019s not use that as a smoke screen to somehow shield Donald Trump’s culpability for inviting Russia to help him in the election, which they did; for trying to coerce Ukraine into helping him in the next election, which he did; into inciting an insurrection, which he did. None of that is undercut, none of that serious misconduct is in any way diminished by the fact that people lied to Christopher Steele. Once again, Schiff flipped the tables on Ortagus and used her slanderous question to reiterate Trump’s treachery with respect to Russia, Ukraine, and January 6th. Schiff has distinguished himself as an articulate prosecutor who displayed that talent in his summation as impeachment manager<\/a><\/strong>. Making a plea for a guilty Senate verdict, Schiff asked senators to remember why America’s Founders included impeachment as a remedy in the Constitution. It was…<\/p>\n “For a man who would sell out his country for a political favor. For a man who would threaten the integrity of our elections. For a man who would invite foreign interference in our affairs. For a man who would undermine our national security and that of our allies. For a man like Donald J. Trump.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n NOTE:<\/strong> Twitter suspended the News Corpse account after 11 years without giving a reason. So if anyone wants to tweet articles from my website<\/a><\/strong>, please feel free to do so often and repeatedly. Also, Be sure to visit and follow News Corpse on Instagram<\/a>.<\/strong> Thanks for your support.<\/p>\n Pressed by #TheView<\/a> guest co-host @MorganOrtagus<\/a> on the Steele dossier, @RepAdamSchiff<\/a> responds: \u201cIt\u2019s one thing to say allegations should be investigated…it\u2019s another to say we should have foreseen in advance that some people were lying to Christopher Steele.\u201d pic.twitter.com\/8EgvKW0tgJ<\/a><\/p>\n — The View (@TheView) November 9, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nSchiff:<\/strong> Well, first of all, whoever lied to the FBI or lied to Christopher Steele should be prosecuted, and they are. And unlike in the Trump administration, if they\u2019re convicted, they should go to jail and not be pardoned. So Donald Trump pardoned Roger Stone for lying. He pardoned Michael Flynn for lying. If people lied to the FBI they should go to jail.<\/p>\n
\nOrtagus:<\/strong> No, I think just your credibility is.
\nSchiff:<\/strong> Well, I think the credibility of your question is in doubt.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n