![\"Donald](\"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/Pix\/Trump\/trump-putin-2016.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
The panic sweat is dripping from the brows of the Trump flunkies as they try to peddle their all too obvious distractions. They run the gamut from trivialities like the wholly concocted controversies about the jeans of Sydney Sweeney<\/a><\/strong>, to the inflation inducing Trump taxes (aka tariffs), to more disturbing and utterly bogus allegations of treason by President Obama and others.<\/p>\n SEE THIS: Trump\u2019s DNI and Fox News Manufacture a New Crackpot Conspiracy Theory Accusing Obama of Treason<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n What the Trump regime operatives are calling the “Russia Hoax”<\/em> has taken center stage, as they flock to Fox News every day to spread their blatant nonsense. And leading the charge is Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, and bona fide Russian asset, Tulsi Gabbard. On Tuesday night Gabbard visited with Fox News Trump-fluffer, Laura Ingraham, who asked a surprisingly relevant question. But predictably, she didn’t get anything resembling a coherent answer…<\/p>\n Ingraham:<\/strong> You said there was irrefutable evidence that Obama was the mastermind of this intelligence manipulation and the perpetuation of the Russia Hoax. What is that irrefutable evidence for our viewers tonight? Whereupon, Gabbard invited the Fox News viewers to read a bunch of garbage that she posted online. As if they would – or can – read. But she didn’t bother to provide any of the allegedly “irrefutable evidence”<\/em> that Ingraham asked for. All of the information that she has presented previously – online or on the air – has been entirely devoid of any factual basis.<\/p>\n Nevertheless, Gabbard went on to tell Ingraham that the online docs would reveal “how President Obama directed that a National Security Council meeting be called to talk about Russia.”<\/em> She claimed that Obama tasked his Intel staff to alter the substance of their reporting on Russia’s well documented interference in the 2016 presidential election. Then she continued, brazenly lying that…<\/p>\n “Per the president\u2019s direction, per the president\u2019s order, and very specifically, they were tasked to create an intelligence assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election – not if, but how. And this was the beginning of this manufactured intelligence assessment where they knowingly wrote things in this assessment that were false.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n To reiterate, Gabbard has still not fulfilled Ingraham’s request for some actual evidence. But now she is asserting, without any proof, that Obama and his staff altered and released falsified data. Not only was the data not false, it was corroborated by the Senate Intelligence Committee five years ago when it was chaired by Republicans, including Trump’s current Secretary of State, Marco Rubio. The bipartisan Committee report said that<\/a><\/strong>…<\/p>\n “…the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multifaceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. […] Moscow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Even Gabbard’s own comments suggest that the Obama did nothing wrong. She notes that Obama asked that the reports include how “Moscow tried to influence the election – not if, but how.”<\/em> She’s implying that there is something untoward about that. But it’s only because the “if”<\/em> was not in doubt. Russia definitely tried to influence the election. Obama wanted to make sure that their methods (the “how”<\/em>) were also included in the report. That’s real honesty and transparency.<\/p>\n For his part, Trump helped to keep all of this in the news with a new comment on his failing Twitter ripoff, Truth Social<\/a><\/strong>. In what appears to be his transcript of what Gabbard said on Fox News, Trump wrote that<\/a><\/strong>…<\/p>\n “Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard: ‘Obama directed that a National Security Council meeting be called… They were tasked to create an Intelligence Assessment that detailed how Moscow tried to influence the election\u2014not ‘if’\u2014but ‘how’… They knowingly wrote things in this assessment that were false.'”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n If nothing else, we have additional confirmation that Trump spends an inordinate amount of his time watching his minions talk about him on Fox News. However, the truly troubling aspects of this go much deeper. Just in the past week we have seen the weaponizing of the law by Trump’s Justice Department and his MAGA contingent in Congress.<\/p>\n Trump’s Attorney Genuflect, Pam Bondi has launched “a grand jury investigation<\/a><\/strong> of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia’s actions during the 2016 election.”<\/em> And GOP Oversight Committee chair, James Comer, has issued subpoenas for depositions<\/a><\/strong> from Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Robert Mueller, William Barr, Jeff Sessions and Alberto Gonzales.<\/p>\n So Bondi and Comer are joining Gabbard in the quest for evidence-free persecution of Democrats and other critics of Dear Leader Trump. None of them actually present any of their imaginary evidence. But they bellow about it publicly in an attempt to get their cult followers and the media to pay attention to their fabrications. And of course, to draw attention away from Epstein and Maxwell and Trump.<\/p>\n The good news is that it isn’t working. The American people – including many Trump supporters – still want the truth to be revealed. They aren’t buying the misdirection tactics. And the pathetic and desperate determination of the Trumpists just makes them look all the more ridiculous.<\/p>\n RELATED STORIES:<\/strong><\/p>\n Be sure to visit and follow News Corpse
\nGabbard:<\/strong> Laura, you know, as you were playing those clips of these people like Morning Joe [Scarborough] seemingly befuddled, saying that by no account is any of this true. I would challenge them to see if they\u2019ve actually read the documents, every single page of the documents that we\u2019ve released over the last couple of weeks.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n
\n
\non Twitter<\/a> and Facebook<\/a> and Bluesky<\/a> and Threads<\/a>.<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n