{"id":68495,"date":"2025-12-16T13:40:55","date_gmt":"2025-12-16T21:40:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=68495"},"modified":"2026-03-13T13:42:03","modified_gmt":"2026-03-13T20:42:03","slug":"is-secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth-covering-up-the-war-crimes-and-he-and-trump-have-committed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=68495","title":{"rendered":"Is Secretary of ‘War’ Pete Hegseth Covering Up the War Crimes that He and Trump Have Committed?"},"content":{"rendered":"

For the past few months Donald Trump has presided over a series of deadly air strikes on boats in the Caribbean that he alleged were engaged in drug trafficking. Never mind that he provided no evidence to support his allegations, or that such strikes in international waters are against international law. And even if there were evidence, the alleged crimes would not have been subject to capital punishment.<\/p>\n

Click here to post this article on Twitter<\/a> or Click here to post on Bluesky<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/p>\n

Trump’s Caribbean misadventures have been conducted purely for what he perceives to be the political benefit of slaughtering what he calls “narco-terrorists”<\/em> (a ridiculous, made up term), and its usefulness in deflecting from his tribulations involving the Epstein files that he continues to suppress. Meanwhile, Trump’s Secretary of “War”<\/em> Pete Hegseth, has holiday visions of bloody corpses dancing in his head…<\/p>\n

SEE THIS: The Nauseating Christmas \u2018Wish\u201d of Trump\u2019s Bloodthirsty Secretary of \u2018War\u2019 Pete Hegseth<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

One particularly disturbing attack occurred on September 2, 2025, when the first air strike left a couple of survivors clinging to the wreckage of their boat. So there was a second strike ordered that succeeded in murdering the two helpless survivors. Most reputable military legal experts have called that a war crime.<\/p>\n

Video of the first strike was released shortly after it occurred, But video of the second strike has been mysteriously withheld. Consequently, there has been a great deal of interest in releasing the second video in order to ascertain the facts that have been mired in controversy and ever-changing.<\/p>\n

When this subject was first raised with Trump, he pretended to have an opinion favoring complete transparency and told reporters that he had “no problem”<\/em> with releasing the second video. But that position didn’t hold for very long…<\/p>\n

On December 3:<\/strong>
\nQuestion:<\/strong> You released video of that first boat strike on September 2nd, but not the second video. will you release the video of that strike so that the American people can see for themselves what happened?
\nTrump:<\/strong> I don’t know what they have, but whatever they have, we\u2019d certainly release. No problem.
\nOn December 8:<\/strong>
\nQuestion:<\/strong> You said you would have no problem with releasing the full video of that strike on September 2nd off the coast of Venezuela.
\nTrump:<\/strong> I didn\u2019t say that. You said that. I didn\u2019t say that. This is ABC fake news…Whatever Hegseth wants to do is OK with me.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

Q: \u201cYou said you would have no problem with releasing the full video of that strike on September 2nd.\u201dTrump: \u201cI didn\u2019t say that. You said that. I didn\u2019t say that. This is ABC fake news.\u201dTrump on Dec. 3: \u201cWhatever they have, we\u2019d certainly release. No problem.\u201d<\/p>\n

— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com)<\/a> 2025-12-08T20:32:26.091Z<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n