{"id":70323,"date":"2026-07-11T14:07:39","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T21:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=70323"},"modified":"2026-07-11T14:07:39","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T21:07:39","slug":"what-1st-amendment-trump-regime-threatens-nyt-journalists-to-compel-them-to-give-up-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/ncWP\/?p=70323","title":{"rendered":"WHAT 1ST AMENDMENT? Trump Regime Threatens NYT Journalists to Compel Them to Give Up Sources"},"content":{"rendered":"

The hostility that Donald Trump has for the free press is nothing new. He has been referring to the media in Stalinist terms as “the enemy of the people”<\/em> for years. And he viciously attacks reporters and news organizations every day simply because they are doing their jobs.<\/p>\n

Click here to post this article on Twitter<\/a> or Click here to post on Bluesky<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/p>\n

Trump actually has a perverse love\/hate relationship with the media. He hates them when they report the truth about him. But he loves being the center of attention. He never lets his aversion to the Constitution’s protection of the free press get in the way of his exploitation of it. While he blames it for all of his problems, he also clings to positive news about himself, if he’s making it up…<\/p>\n

SEE THIS: Delusional Donald: Does Trump Really Believe He\u2019s Ultra Popular with Record High Approval Ratings?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Trump’s assault on the First Amendment has taken many disturbing forms. He frequently sues journalists and media companies as a means of punishing them for their honest reporting. And he orders his federal agencies to clamp down on companies that have the audacity to reveal his personal and professional flaws. Which is what just happened with his “Justice”<\/em> Department issuing subpoenas to several New York Times reporters. As reported by the Times<\/a><\/strong>…<\/p>\n

“The Trump administration issued subpoenas on Friday to several journalists for The New York Times, after the news outlet reported this week on security concerns involving President Trump\u2019s new Qatari-donated Air Force One. […] The subpoenas \u2014 which seek to force the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday \u2014 were an extraordinary escalation in President Trump\u2019s efforts to threaten and intimidate independent news organizations.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Times noted that “the subpoenas contain few specifics,”<\/em> other than demanding that the journalists testify before a Grand Jury “in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law”<\/em> having something to do with a Times story about Trump departing Turkey<\/a><\/strong> on the “old”<\/em> Air Force One because of “a security precaution at the urging of the Secret Service.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Trump’s press office responded to the Times’story by insisting that it was false. It was, however, a legitimate story that exposed the carelessness of the Trump administration and it’s lack of concern for operational security. They claimed that Trump switched planes and diverted the new Qatari bribe jet to a military base in England because some soldiers there really wanted to see it (yeah, right).<\/p>\n

Therefore, any allegation that the Times broke a law, or that the leaker did, is moot. You can’t be accused of leaking sensitive or classified information if what you wrote wasn’t actually sensitive or classified. And according to the Trump propaganda team it wasn’t. So either Trump and company are lying, or there was no violation of the law.<\/p>\n

What’s more, the Times’ story was published after Trump switched to the properly secured Air Force One from the Qatari bribe jet, and was already safely at home. and you can’t be accused of endangering the president if what you wrote was published entirely after the fact, and there was no risk to the president.<\/p>\n

To the contrary, the Times actually made the president safer by insuring that the Qatari jet would not be used by the president unless and until it is properly upgraded to Secret Service standards. Consequently, the Times responded to the subpoenas in a blunt statement by their attorney, David McCraw:<\/p>\n

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects. Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public\u2019s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used. This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The morning after this legal brouhaha Trump once again lashed out at the media. He posted a tediously long and incoherent comment<\/a><\/strong> on his dedicated propaganda platform, Truth Social<\/a><\/strong>, attacking New York Times reporters, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, in his typically infantile manner, saying in part that…<\/p>\n

“Maggot Hagerman has covered me incorrectly for ten years. Her book is a joke! 90% of it is Fake News…Maggot is a loser! […] Anyway, don\u2019t buy their book, it\u2019s garbage!”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

For the record, Haberman and Swan’s book “Regime Change”<\/em><\/a><\/strong> is currently #1 on Amazon. Trump went on in this comment to boast that he has “just finished a perfect physical at Walter Reed, I do it every six months, and I requested another Cognitive Test.”<\/em> There are reasons that he needs to take annual physicals three or four times a year, along with repeated cognitive tests. Doctors wouldn’t do them if he wasn’t showing signs of mental impairment.<\/p>\n

Trump followed up that comment with an even longer and less coherent harangue, whining about “The Failing New York Times,”<\/em> along with the Wall Street Journal, MS NOW, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC. Adding that they should all just say that “We give up, we can\u2019t beat him.”<\/em> Which is wishful thinking on his part. He wouldn’t be freaking out this badly if he weren’t really afraid of losing the upcoming midterm elections and finding himself under investigation by Democrats in Congress who intend to hold him accountable for his multitude of crimes. for a change.<\/p>\n

RELATED STORIES:<\/strong><\/p>\n