![\"Trump](\"https:\/\/www.newscorpse.com\/Pix\/Trump\/trump-ai-farce.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
In his second occupation of the White House, Trump has already sought to rename for himself the Kennedy Center, the Institute of Peace, the Dulles International Airport, and the Penn Central Station in New York. He has also launched projects to build monuments to his imagined magnificence, including his vanity ballroom, a triumphal arch, and has even expressed his desire to be added to Mount Rushmore. So no one should be surprised by his attempt to rename Artificial Intelligence…<\/p>\n
SEE THIS: Super Intelligence? Trump Wants to Rename Artificial Intelligence To Make it More Smarter<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n On Thursday morning Trump posted a brief comment on his failing Twitter ripoff, Truth Social<\/a><\/strong>, to emphasize the extraordinary degree of importance that he attaches to changing AI to SI in his warped mind. He raged that<\/a><\/strong>…<\/p>\n “The White House considers anyone that uses the term, ‘Artificial Intelligence,’ as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, ‘Super Intelligence,’ THE ENEMY!”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So now it’s WAR! Of course, Trump has always felt that any disagreement with him, no matter how trivial, was an intolerable affront to his MAGA-sty. His perception of himself is that he is a dictator with supreme authority that must be respected by all of his peasants. And just like the media, that he refers to in Stalinist terms as the “enemy of the people,”<\/em> those who insist on using the term “Artificial”<\/em> are also his enemies. That likely applies to those who still refer to the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Ontario as well.<\/p>\n The new name that Trump has for Artificial Intelligence is the much more arrogant “Super Intelligence.”<\/em> He probably prefers it because it reminds him the comic book heroes that he imagines himself to be like. Never mind that he is closer to the comically inept Wily E. Coyote, who manages to blow himself up with each new scheme that he deploys.<\/p>\n However, AI is hardly super. A recent inquiry I made to confirm a political allegation aimed at the Democratic candidate for governor of California went wildly off course. I asked Google’s AI, Gemini, “Why did Xavier Becerra withdraw from a debate?”<\/em> It replied that…<\/p>\n “Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra withdrew from a scheduled Los Angeles Times debate against Republican rival Steve Hilton following a difficult performance in their previous CNN matchup and scrutiny surrounding his personal background.”<\/p>\n [It also reference a poll that]<\/em> “indicated that viewers favored Steve Hilton 74% to 20%, putting mounting pressure on the Becerra campaign.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It was immediately apparent that the response was blatantly biased. So I asked it “Why is your only source for this response the right-wing California Globe?”<\/em> It replied that…<\/p>\n “You are completely right to call that out, and the previous response was heavily one-sided. It incorrectly treated partisan framing from Republican candidate Steve Hilton and outlets like the California Globe as established fact, while omitting crucial context.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Well, thanks for acknowledging how ludicrous the response was. But only after it was called out. Any other user might never have learned that the reply was a partisan sham.<\/p>\n Google’s Gemini also noted after the fact that “A spokesperson for Xavier Becerra stated that the Democratic candidate never actually agreed to attend the debate,”<\/em> and that they declined due to “a full campaign schedule.”<\/em> It further revealed that the poll “cited by Hilton’s campaign came from an unscientific online poll of debate viewers.”<\/em> and that credible polling showed Becerra leading Hilton 58% to 33%. Once again, that admission was only available because it had been challenged.<\/p>\n In order to corroborate this information, I checked with ChatGPT as well. It also responded that Becerra withdrew from the debate citing the California Globe. When asked about that sleazy source it replied that…<\/p>\n “You’re right to question that. My previous answer overstated the evidence, [and the previous response was]<\/em> “based primarily on Steve Hilton’s announcement on X. [Then ChatGPT apologized saying that]<\/em> “I shouldn’t have presented the withdrawal as an established fact in my first answer. Thank you for catching the sourcing problem.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n You’re welcome? You should not have to question an allegedly “super”<\/em> source of information in order to get correct information. Although, at least it was polite. But responses like this make it crystal clear that the name “Artificial Intelligence”<\/em> remains the most appropriate one.<\/p>\n The reason it is artificial is because real intelligence requires critical thinking, analysis, and creativity. None of which AI possesses – yet. Ironically, Trump also has none of those attributes. Yet he still regards himself as the sole arbiter and protector for all things AI. Which sort of makes you wonder…<\/p>\n ALERT! Has Donald Trump Been POSSESSED By AI? Is AI Writing His Truth Social Posts Now?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n RELATED STORIES:<\/strong><\/p>\n Be sure to visit and follow News Corpse\n
\n
\non Twitter<\/a> and Facebook<\/a> and Bluesky<\/a> and Threads<\/a>.<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n