Uh Oh. Did Sarah Palin Call Obama “Boy” On Hannity Last Night?

On Wednesday, President Obama spoke to the nation about his plans to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the ISIL organization that has embarked on a terrorist spree in Iraq. Sarah Palin must have been busy brawling at drunken rave in Wasilla at the time because she didn’t make it to Fox News until the next day. And based on what she said last night to Sean Hannity, she might have been better off going another round.

Fox News has been predictably critical of Obama’s initiative to defeat ISIL. Their post-speech analysis didn’t include a single Obama supporter. But few have gone where Palin just took the debate. In her introductory comments to Hannity she began by saying…

“Dear Lord, these boys are so arrogant and that’s getting in the way of sound policy that will keep America secure and our allies.”

Be Sure To “LIKE” News Corpse On Facebook

Fox News Sarah Palin

Is it too much for these rancid bigots to refrain from referring to the first African-American President of the United States as “boy?” If they want to call him arrogant or belittle his commitment to the nation’s security, that’s pretty much their standard hate-speech fare, but there are some lines that you would think they would not cross.

Palin continues her warped assessment of the situation by whining about Obama’s determination to protect American soldiers by keeping them from becoming cannon fodder for jihadists in the Middle East. She said…

“And now here we are saying it’s gonna take boots on the ground to win this thing, and yet we’re not gonna send boots on the ground? We’re gonna contract this thing out when there is no mightier power than the red, white, and blue?”

That’s right. We’re not gonna send boots on the ground. That’s because the rightful parties to wage this battle are the Iraqis and their regional neighbors. Why is Palin, and so much of the right, obsessed with spilling more American blood overseas, which is exactly what the enemy wants us to do?

Palin and Hannity spend the rest of the segment in a nearly incoherent dialog that is impossible to transcribe in proper English. They touch briefly on inane concepts like whether ISIL is Islamic, or constitute being a state, merely because they say so. Since when do we allow terrorists to define the world for us? Palin and Hannity appear to have more respect for the enemy’s judgment than their president’s. That shows where their loyalties lie. Here is a typical passage from the segment:

Hannity: Let me ask you this. When the President says that the Islamic State is not Islamic, when he says that ISIS is not a state but they have more territory, it’s bigger than the size of Belgium, so they have the money, they’re more brutal, now they have the territory, maybe not recognized by the United Nations, but they certainly own a lot of that territory, and the President said another thing, he said that ISIS has no vision, I’m thinking don’t they have a vision? Isn’t what they were doing in Mosul, either convert or die, isn’t that a vision for a caliphate where the world is dominated by their brand of Islam?

Palin: It’s not just a vision that’s so obvious, it’s an articulated mission that they’re on, and that is the caliphate. That is the take over of the region, and guess what…we’re next on the hit list. So like Barack Obama, like the rest of us, hear these bad guys, these terrorists, promising that they will raise the flag of Allah over our White House, for the life of me I don’t know why he does not take this serious, the threat, because yes, it’s more than a vision. They’re telling us, just like Hitler did all those years ago when a war could have been avoided because Hitler, too, didn’t hide his intentions. Well, ISIS, these guys are not hiding their intentions either.

The only comprehensible viewpoint that can be squeezed from that rhetorical mess is that Palin and Hannity believe that ISIL is capable of defeating and ruling the entire planet. They believe that ISIL’s 20,000 desert rats can prevail over America’s 2.2 million active and reserve forces (not to mention the rest of the world’s military). In what reality do those numbers make any sense? If they just wanted to assert that ISIL is capable of causing harm, they would have been on solid ground. But by insisting that the threat to raise the flag of ISIL over the White House is a serious potential outcome they are thrusting themselves into the realm of fools (where I am sure they would be quite comfortable).

Ending on a comedic note, Palin did relieve herself of some apparently long-suppressed guilt. She told Hannity that…

“As I watched the speech last night the thought going through my mind is: I owe America a global apology because John McCain – through all of this – John McCain should be our president.”

Indeed, an apology is definitely in order. Except it should be coming from McCain who saddled American with this addled-brained cretin. However, it is interesting that Palin is, in effect, confessing that she she was the reason that McCain lost the election. There was more to it than that, but this is the start of coming to grips with reality.

Advertisement:

13 thoughts on “Uh Oh. Did Sarah Palin Call Obama “Boy” On Hannity Last Night?

  1. Your title seems to be a bit of a reach here…don’t you think? Or is every word now going to be analyzed. She is very popular with Fox News and this bunch – not sure anyone is really paying attention to her.

    • Boys? Not a reach, just a thinly veiled dog whistle. “This bunch” knew exactly what she inferred.

      • More like a kook whistle – no one really cares. I guess you hear what you want to hear – she doesn’t matter to anyone except those who like to keep the hate alive. Try moving on.

      • That “dog whistle” stuff is total bovine excrement. Lefties even claim that you’re a racist if you use the dreaded word “Chicago”. Grow up.

        • Why are conservatives so obsessed with Chicago?

          • Not sure we are – but since you suggested it – it’s funny how a city run by a leftist mayor has somehow become the most violent out of control city in the country – well done lefties.

  2. If the President is a boy Palin is a Transgender

  3. Who went and used a word like caliphate in Palin’s presence. She didn’t have the good sense to refudiate it before she looked it up. Shows the circles she’s running in.

  4. One cannot wallow unendingly in hatred without it becoming a self-cancer. Alas, Palin has.

  5. With her prominence, the world must think All Americans are Honey-Boo-Boos.

  6. I just want to say I owe America a GLOBAL apology…because she is so well-rounded?

    OK OK “comprehensive” is a definition that would not have occurred to me, I wouldn’t use it as a synonym for that but I suppose it works. I just cannot help thinking that she doesn’t know that definition though and like so many of her speeches she simply inserts words to make them “soundy” …(an analogue to “Truthy”, Soundy implies that something sounds as if it carries weight, merit, gravitas; regardless of whether it makes any damn sense at all.)

    adjective
    1. pertaining to the whole world; worldwide; universal:
    the dream of global peace.
    2. comprehensive.
    3. globular; globe-shaped.
    4. of, pertaining to, or using a terrestrial or celestial globe.
    5. (of a computer operation, linguistic rule, etc.) operating on a group of similar strings, commands, etc., in a single step.

  7. Sarah Palin is a jealous, evil, awful woman. She’s on Fox because she will say, angrily and with a sneer, anything Roger wants her too. Hannity should be ashamed, but that would mean he had a conscience and a brain. The right wants another war…I think they just want us always in war. But, supposedly, they are the “Christians?” Yeah, like they are the party of the people….white men with money maybe. This woman needs to go away, and maybe last Saturday’s brawl will finally get her and her band of trouble makers off the airwaves.

    • Sarah Palin is NOT an evil awful woman. The evil surrounding Ms. Palin comes exclusively from the Palin haters. They have embarrassed themselves time and time again. Ms. Palin will not go away. So the left can either get used to this fact, or they can keep having one cow after another.

Comments are closed.