Mitt Romney Shamelessly Politicizes A SEAL Who Was Killed In Libya

It doesn’t get much more despicable than this. In his stump speech, Mitt Romney has begun telling a story of how he met Navy SEAL Glenn Doherty at a neighborhood party. Doherty was one of those killed in the attack on the U.S. embassy in Bengazi, Libya. In his account of the meeting, Romney says they casually discussed their mutual home state of Massachusetts, skiing, and other trivialities. However, his account may not be entirely accurate, which, knowing, Romney, would come as no surprise.

Romney apparently attended the party by accident, having arrived at the wrong address. It was at a neighbor’s home where he observed a party and assumed that it was one to which he had been invited. In his own words, he wasn’t particularly interested in going:

“I thought, ‘Oh, my goodness. I wasn’t planning on going to this, but we’ll look like we’re not social if we don’t show up.’”

So right off the bat, Romney couldn’t have cared less about these people, he was only concerned with how it would look if he took a pass, which is a pretty selfish attitude. But what’s worse is that his portrayal of the events has been contradicted by a friend of the family at the party who remembers the encounter very differently.

Elf Ellefsen was a friend of Doherty’s and remembers Romney going around introducing himself as “Mitt Romney, a political figure.” Ellefsen says Romney introduced himself to Doherty four times, apparently not remembering the previous introductions. Here is how Ellefsen described the evening and Doherty’s impressions of Romney:

“He said it was very comical,” Ellefsen said, “Mitt Romney approached him ultimately four times, using this private gathering as a political venture to further his image. He kept introducing himself as Mitt Romney, a political figure. The same introduction, the same opening line. Glen believed it to be very insincere and stale.”

Ellefsen said Doherty remembered Romney as robotic.

“He said it was pathetic and comical to have the same person come up to you within only a half hour, have this person reintroduce himself to you, having absolutely no idea whatsoever that he just did this 20 minutes ago, and did not even recognize Glen’s face.”

Asked what he thought of his friend’s story being used on the political stump, Ellefsen said:

“Honestly it does make me sick. Glen would definitely not approve of it. He probably wouldn’t do much about it. He probably wouldn’t say a whole lot about it. I think Glen would feel, more than anything, almost embarrassed for Romney. I think he would feel pity for him.”

And as if that weren’t enough to condemn Romney’s brazen exploitation of a real tragedy, Doherty’s mother came forward today to tell Romney to stop talking about her son:

“I don’t trust Romney,” Barbara Doherty told WHDH 7. “He shouldn’t make my son’s death part of his political agenda. It’s wrong to use these brave young men, who wanted freedom for all, to degrade Obama.”

A Romney aide said that Romney would stop using this story, but he has already re-told it a couple of times today, so Mrs. Doherty was correct to not trust him. She is also correct that it’s wrong to use such stories to advance a political campaign. Romney may think that he’s showing a softer side of himself but, in fact, he’s showing how insensitive and exploitative he can be.

It’s interesting to note that Fox News, who is generally quick to jump on stories about fallen heroes and the human interest aspects that come from their families and associates, has completely ignored the news about Doherty’s mother and friend, and their distaste for Romney’s actions.

Nevertheless, Fox continues its effort to turn the Libyan attack into a scandal that is somehow Obama’s fault. Throughout the day Fox aired segments of House hearings into what occurred. However, in almost every instance they only aired segments when Republicans were questioning witnesses, and they cut away when it was a Democrat’s turn. Fair and balanced, as always.

A Pictorial Presentation Of The Polling Schizophrenia At Fox News

It may seriously be time to have the folks at Fox committed to an institution for evaluation. They have become utterly unhinged, particularly with regard to election polling which is notoriously volatile. So without further ado, here’s a graphic illustration of the depths of their dementia.

First, Fox News loves polls and posts them abundantly when Romney is ahead:

Fox Nation Polls - Romney Ahead

Then Fox News hates polls and banishes them when Obama surges into the lead:

Fox News Polls - Obama Ahead

Then Fox News loves polls again when Romney gets a post-debate bump:

Fox Nation Polls - Romney Bump

They are leading their audience on a roller coaster ride of propaganda and censorship as they shift from celebrating positive electoral news to suppressing the negative. Fox is so determined to shut out anything that might challenge their delusions that they even fail to report their own Fox News polls if Obama is ahead.

Fox Nation Polls - Except Fox

That’s how important it is to them to make sure their audience remains ignorant. And all the while they seem to think that it’s liberals who are fooling themselves.

Fox News Polls Liberals

The article above was written by Dan Gainor of the uber-conservative Media Research Center. The MRC recently launched a campaign to get people to stop watching what they call the “mainstream” media which, of course, doesn’t include Fox News, the highest rated cable news network. That’s really just a campaign to put blinders on the eyes of their right-wing disciples to keep them from being tainted by honest journalism and diverse opinions.

It’s ironic that Gainor is criticizing liberals for disparaging a poll when conservatives are the ones that are totally blocking out any polls they don’t happen to like. They spent hours on the air alleging that the media is deliberately skewing the polls. But what’s worse is that Gainor is making up his allegation that liberals attacked the Pew poll. There is nothing in his article that supports that charge. In fact, quite the contrary. While Gainor cited the Daily Beast’s Andrew Sullivan and the New York Times’ Nate Silver, neither of them criticized Pew’s survey. And Gainor thoroughly misrepresented the column by Joshua Holland of Alternet saying that Holland’s column “could be summed up in one word: disbelieve!” For the record, here is what Holland had to say about whether the Pew poll should be dismissed:

“No. That’s making the same fundamental error as the “poll truthers” on the right. […] Good polls using industry standard methodology can and do find wide variation in party ID – leave the trutherism to the nutjobs at Fox News.”

At no point did Holland say to “disbelieve” Pew or any other poll. In fact, his column is a great resource for understanding and evaluating polling in their proper context and is highly recommended reading. It offers a calm and sane approach to analyzing news, as opposed to the feverish ravings of the FoxPods who accuse all of the media of skewing all of the polls – that is, until the polls favor their candidate.

The only thing Gainor’s article does is affirm the dishonesty of the right and their obsessive determination with controlling the thinking of their cultish followers. His fabrications are surely part of the reason that readers and viewers of Fox News are so lost in a muddle of conflicting fantasies. Generally when someone is this detached from reality they are taken somewhere where they cannot present a risk to themselves or others. Unfortunately, these deluded souls are still allowed to drive automobiles and, worse, to vote.