The Fear Of Censorship

John Roberts has been CNN’s senior national correspondent and its anchor of the awkwardly-named This Week at War (sounds like a VH1 Top 20 Countdown). He was recently named a new co-host of CNN’s American Morning. In his former position at CBS he served as the network’s White House correspondent and was embedded with Marines during the invasion of Iraq. Now, in an interview with Broadcasting & Cable, this experienced and connected professional speaks out about the handling of the coverage of the war in Iraq and, despite his participation, he has some rather unflattering critiques of what transpired.

In the article, Roberts concedes that the media was unprepared to properly cover events on the ground and should have been more vigilant in the run-up to the war. But by far the more notable observation that Roberts imparts is one that reflects on current coverage:

“If we showed people the full extent of what we see every day in Iraq, we would either have no one watching us because they couldn’t stand to see the pictures, or we would get so many letters of complaint that some organization would come down on us to stop.”

With current polls showing that two thirds of the American public are already opposed to the war in Iraq, the notion that we have not yet reached the nadir of our disapproval is somewhat unsettling. Especially if the reason is that, as Roberts contends, the “full extent” of what the press sees every day has been withheld from us by a media establishment that is afraid of mail and of losing viewers. And I get no consolation from Roberts’ informing me that things are much worse than I ever imagined.

Indeed, the pictures that are presently darkening our TV screens with bloodshed, blasts, and blackened smoke, are enough to sow depression in the most optimistic amongst us. But that is not sufficient reason for responsible journalists to soft-peddle even a harsh reality. In an open democratic society, citizens need to be fully informed because, contrary to the monarchal delusions of President Bush, we are the deciders. If exposure to the truth produces more dissatisfaction, it is not up to editors and programmers to shield us from our own tender sensitivities. That is not the way to cultivate an informed electorate. That is not the way to promote Democracy.

The public’s appetite for this war has steadily declined over the past four years and would likely have declined further and faster had the news been presented impartially and honestly. In fact, we might never have gone to war in the first place if the vigilance of which Roberts spoke had been practiced at the outset by a conscientious and ethical press corps.

There are two problems (at least) with Roberts’ statement above. One is that he gives too much weight to the notion that Americans don’t have the stomach to manage the nation as our Constitution requires. The other is that his fear that “some organization” would put a stop to honest, unfettered reporting, resulted in that fear becoming manifest. The fear of censorship produced censorship and the people were deprived of knowledge. The only organization that profited from this suppression is an administration that was predisposed to execute a war of aggression and preferred to avoid the pesky interference of the will of the people.

To paraphrase Roberts:

If we, the people, show the full extent of what we see and feel every day about Iraq, they would know that we are watching, and they would get so many letters of complaint that our organization of citizens would come down on them to stop suppressing the truth; stop embracing unscrupulous pseudo-leaders; and stop this god-awful war.

This practice of Nanny Journalism is all too common in American media. They think we can’t handle the truth. But it’s funny (by which I mean pathetic) that they keep coming back after the fact to confess their mea culpas.


6 thoughts on “The Fear Of Censorship

  1. “That is not the way to cultivate an informed electorate. That is not the way to promote Democracy.”

    Ah, but it IS the way to shore up ratings and protect market share. And these days, that’s what the News Corpse is all about.

  2. Quite true. That’s exactly why Roberts said that no one would be watching if they actually presented the whole truth.

    But while it’s true, it’s also sad.

  3. The Iraqi government is now being painted with failure, while last month they were painted with hope.

    What’s different is that the united exploiters of our American Congress and Executive Administration (as well, the Big Oil men pulling their strings) see that the current regime in Baghdad isn’t going to sign-off on the oil revenue sharing agreements drawn up somewhere other than Iraq.

    Watch front-line(equals paid-for) Democrats start falling into line with our pResident due to the ‘worsening tragedy’ enveloping Iraq.

  4. Heath, I hope you’re wrong.

    So far Dems have been a mixed bag. They were slow to take up the people’s call to end the war, but they have been catching up with us lately. Feingold’s amendment got 13 votes (I think) the first time around. Yesterday it got 29. As Bush would say, “We’re making progress.”

  5. Pingback: Oliver Willis
  6. What a hypocrite.

    He enjoyed shock and awe and now that he’s opposite that leg showing beauty on CNN he’s suddenly into mea culpas.

    How reprehensible when such hypocrites make it to the top.

    What a hypocrite!

Comments are closed.