A report from Business Week reveals that Rupert Murdoch is keen on electing Republican governors. His News Corp donated a million dollars to the Republican Governors Association in June.
This is a significant contribution to a partisan electoral committee. There are 37 governorships on the ballot this year. Democrats currently hold a majority of state houses, Republicans hope reverse that. And since this is census year, the control of state governments can have a huge impact on the make up of Congress for the next decade by managing the redistricting process.
It should come as no surprise to political observers that partisans on both sides are lining up to support the party they regard as most sympathetic to their views. Unions will back Democrats. Wall Street and Oil companies will back Republicans. But what makes this unique is that the media are supposed to be unaffiliated politically. How can they produce unbiased coverage of electoral issues while they are spending millions to benefit one side. Can we really expect them to be critical of the GOP when they are bankrolling their campaigns?
Not that Murdoch’s news enterprises have ever produced unbiased coverage in the first place. His Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, Fox Radio, etc., have made it their business to advocate on behalf of the GOP for years. Their anchors and reporters routinely bash Democrats and liberals. But the funds they are providing to the RGA will result in further Democrat bashing which Fox News will dutifully report on the air. And no doubt the RGA will allocate a considerable amount of their advertising budget to Fox News and other Murdoch entities. So Murdoch is effectively putting that money right back in his own pocket while advancing the goals of Republican candidates.
This is one of the most disturbing consequences of the modern media environment where giant corporations have been permitted to control so much of the press. They are devoted only to their own fiduciary interests as opposed to the public interest. Their international stature means that have no loyalty to any particular nation including the United States. Yet they can provide virtually unlimited funding to influence elections that impact the lives of millions of actual citizens who cannot hope to match that kind of political philanthropy. And with the recent ruling in the Citizens United case, these corporations can now expand their charitable largess to federal campaigns. Congressman Paul Hodes and Senator Chris Dodd have each introduced legislation in their respective chambers to reverse Citizens United, but there is still much work to be done.
What Can You Do?
- Support Congressman Alan Grayson who has introduced a package of bills designed to “Defend Our Democracy.”
- Sign on to the Pledge to Protect America’s Democracy sponsored by People For the American Way and Public Citizen.
- Move to Amend the Constitution to establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights.
- Support The DISCLOSE Act to combat the new, unregulated corporate influence over elections.
- Join the Fair Elections Now campaign to end corporate funded elections.
- And get aboard the Free Press movement to reform the media, save the Internet, and restore independence, diversity and local representation in the media.
If we don’t succeed in returning control of our elections and our media to the people, we will continue to see perversions of democracy like that which News Corp is engaging in. Media corporations can’t serve the public while simultaneously financing partisan politics and padding their bank accounts, all at the public’s expense.
Update: For reference, the RGA also received donations (pdf) from wingnut billionaire David Koch ($1,000,000), GE ($105,000), Comcast ($50,000), Time Warner ($25,000), and SEIU ($100,000) Does Glenn Back know about that last one?
The DGA received donations (pdf) from AFSCME ($1,000,000), GE ($105,000), Comcast ($100,000), Time Warner ($35,000), and SEIU ($325,000), but $0.00 from News Corp.
Note that many organizations, including unions and media companies, play both sides of the fence. But News Corp is the only media enterprise that contributed to just one party. Fair and balanced my ass.
6 thoughts on “Fair And Balanced Fox News Funds GOP”
Fair and balanced my ass? How balanced and fair are the corporate donations YOU listed? Murdoch is merely trying to BALANCE the overtly left leaning dollar numbers here. Jeez. There are plenty of news organizations that lean left–to balance them you need funds and organizations that lean right. THAT’S FAIR AND BALANCED.
All of the so-called left media gave nearly equal amounts to both sides. Only News Corp gave to only one side. How is that fair or balanced?
And if you believe that Murdoch made his donation to balance anything, you are terminally naive.
“That News Corp donation we referenced above has been a hot topic on the interwebs, as you knew it would be. But many Fox Haters have decided that the truth is an insufficiently incendiary headline, so they have to falsify the story to ramp up the incitement quotient. Chris Golas [noticed]* this tactic being used by the [unreliable]** [propagandists]^ of News Corpse:”
‘A blog called “NewsCorpse” did just that with the headline: Fair And Balanced Fox News Funds GOP. In one word that is WRONG. News Corp donated the money to the RGA-NOT FOX NEWS. How dumb can someone get?’
“One alternative explanation is not that they’re dumb; they just think their readers are. After all, to claim that News Corp’s donation affects the companies they own would mean arguing that because of the contribution, Family Guy, Glee, and The Simpsons are nothing but GOP propaganda. Not to mention Avatar, X-Men, the National Rugby League, and Australian Golf Digest! So to disguise the stupidity of such transparent claptrap, instead they falsely state the donation came from “Fox News”. And the echo chamber is off and running:”
J$P: Fox Haters Week in Review!
1) The headline of this article, like all headlines, is shorthand intended to deliver a salient point in the full text. And the full text explicitly notes that News Corp, the parent of Fox News, made the donation to the GOP.
2) If anything is dumb it is the attempt to conflate the Fox Entertainment Network with the Fox News Channel. FEN was, until recently, run by Peter Chernin, a lifelong Democrat. Murdoch left him alone because he made Murdoch boatloads of money. All of the programs cited above were the product of Chernin’s reign. And it has nothing to do with the indisputably biased content on FNC.
As usual, Johnny Dollar embarrasses himself just by showing up.
Wow. Outrage for Murdoch making a political donation to the RGA. But listed ONLY AS A FOOTNOTE to this article is a mention that TimeWarner made a donation to the DGA. TimeWarner… the owner of CNN, Headline News, and more than two dozen cable networks. Where’s the equal outrage??? Nowhere to be seen, because the mainstream media is so biased as to be completely blind and dumb. 🙁
That’s because Time Warner made contributions to BOTH sides. Only Murdoch donated to one side.
Comments are closed.