This week a Massachusetts judge dismissed the conviction of a man who was caught surreptitiously taking photographs underneath the skirt of a female undercover transit officer. The dismissal was based on the judge’s contorted interpretation of the law that found that the woman was not “partially nude” and therefore not a victim.
The Massachusetts legislature quickly drafted and passed an amendment to the law that clarified what constituted a violation. Gov. Deval Patrick signed the bill Friday, making this statement:
“The legislation makes the secret photographing, videotaping, or electronically surveiling of another person’s sexual or other intimate parts, whether under or around a person’s clothing or when a reasonable person would believe that the person’s intimate parts would not be visible to the public, a crime.”
The media was all over this disturbing story with a nearly lascivious glee. It’s the sort of sex crime controversy that starts tabloid editors salivating. So it is not surprising that Fox News, the tabloidiest channel of them all, covered the story excitedly in their broadcast. However, Fox may be exposing themselves to legal liability due to their penchant for featuring the physical assets of their female hosts and guests.
The evidence that is abundantly available of Fox News videotaping “under or around a person’s clothing” could be used against them in a court of law. If one of their employees were to press charges it wouldn’t be difficult to make a case given the thousands of hours of video proof. What’s more, executives at Fox have privately admitted that exploiting the sexuality of their nearly all-blonde roster of women presenters is a key part of their corporate culture. Gabriel Sherman wrote in his biography of Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, “The Loudest Voice In The Room,” that Ailes has repeatedly given direction to his staff regarding the display of female body parts. For instance:
- When the view of reporter Kiran Chetry was obstructed, Ailes called the control booth to demand that they “Move that damn laptop, I can’t see her legs!”
- Ailes complained about host Catherine Crier’s attire saying that “I did not spend x-number of dollars on a glass desk for her to wear pant suits.”
- The casting of The Five included one particular co-host because “I Need The Leg. That’s Andrea Tantaros.”
Furthermore, NPR’s media reporter David Folkenflik was told by knowledgeable sources about the Fox News “Leg Cam” that “goes directly for the legs.” And when host Megyn Kelly was interviewed by GQ (with an accompanying, and revealing, pictorial), she was asked about her own “glass table that shows off your legs.” She responded that “Well, It’s a visual business. People want to see the anchor.” That must be why Bill O’Reilly wears those low-cut blouses. Also, when Gretchen Carlson was tapped to replace Megyn Kelly in daytime, she revealed that “pants were not allowed on Fox & Friends,” and teased viewers with the prospect that on her new show “I might forget my clothes the first day.”
News Corpse Presents: The ALL NEW 2nd volume of
Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance.
Available now at Amazon.
It would fun to see Fox News get hit with an indictment for breaking the Massachusetts Peeping Tom law. But don’t hold your breath. The Foxettes are firmly committed to the mission of their employer despite the fact that they are being exploited as sexual objects. They know that their livelihood depends on the 60+ male demographic that makes up the bulk of their audience. So if they have to suffer the indignity of catering to those perverts, they suck it up, cash their hefty paychecks, and try to remember to keep their legs tightly crossed.
14 thoughts on “Foxettes On Parade: Is Fox News Breaking The Massachusetts Upskirting Law?”
And folks, there you have it, Mark is apparently so obsessed with the possibility of pulling this upskirting crap on FNC anchors that he runs through countless hours of tape just to catch those screen shots. You truly are sick. By the way, why won’t you show that photo of President Obama where he appears to be ogling some young woman’s posterior? Hmm?
There you have nothing. Apparently nothing. There’s nothing ovsessive about reporting on hypocrisy. You stink at spin.
Let’s point out who is spinning here. The Massachusetts legislature and Gov. Patrick did the right thing in record time, and Marky Mark somehow tries to graft that onto the fact that FNC’s female anchors wear skirts. And he makes himself look disgusting in the process.
Not quite, he isn’t saying that they “wear skirts”, he said a lot more than that in fact. It is telling that you don’t rebut the fact that what he says about the way the female hosts on Fox “reveal their secrets” at all. Very telling indeed.
Then again. we all already know you are a biased ;little shit with an agenda against this site. So I guess your posts were as necessary as they have always been.
Yes, I have an agenda against this site because Mark does nothing but lie continuously. And it is just sick how anybody would look for photos like that to embarrass people. He reminds me of that sicko who kept stalking Erin Andrews.
You have an agenda because you’re a paid Fox whore troll.
“biased little shit” said the pot to the kettle – try looking in the mirror some time.
Delu, don’t be surprised that “professional troll” Scott has once again failed to grasp the meaning of this article. He completely ignores the facts about how Fox News purposefully exploits and degrades women. I even provided quotes from their CEO.
But all Scott can do is lamely try to insult me, as if showing evidence of exploitation is itself exploitation (and it took me about 10 minutes to Google those photos). Scott is a desperate little troll who proves that he can’t form a coherent argument every time he comments.
I will say, after reading these replies, and checking out the “Americans Against Tea Parties”, I am so proud not to be a Democrat, Liberal. You are the meanest bunch of people…seriously. You should be ashamed of yourselves and your president. I know, I’m a racist…got it. I have a question, I think your VP is a complete idiot, now, am I a racist?
Mark, I have destroyed your hate-filled little screeds time and time again. And once again, I am not a paid troll. Nobody pays me to destroy your arguments. That is yet another lie that you and your comrades keep spewing. I do it because it’s fun, and because somebody has to do it.
Mark, you are an ageist. There is nothing perverted about a man of any age who enjoys looking at pretty women, esp. with their complete consent and willingness. No, the perversion is watching this idiot-squawk channel in the first place.
For the record, I did not mean that all older men are perverts – only the ones that are watching Fox News for their parade of titillating blondes.
Fox News is shallow, vapid, silly and atrociously sexist. Kinda like CPAC.
Well shallow fox would never write a blog with up the skirt shots.
Comments are closed.