Bill O’Reilly’s Cavalcade Of Lies: A Handy Collection Of The Damage – So Far

Three weeks ago News Corpse published an article revealing that Bill O’Reilly of Fox News had been less than truthful about his alleged exploits as a “war” correspondent. Two weeks later Mother Jones Magazine did an even more thorough analysis of O’Reilly’s pathological embellishments with solid evidence of blatant dishonesty. Ever since then the flow of embarrassing revelations that expose O’Reilly as a self-aggrandizing, jet-powered ego has run non-stop.

Bill O'Reilly

Please click here to SHARE this On Facebook

ONE: The parade of falsehoods began with O’Reilly’s claim to have been “on the ground in active war zones” during the Falkland Islands war with the United Kingdom. He wasn’t. And now there is video of him reporting from Buenos Aires, Argentina that contradicts the accounts he gave afterward.

TWO: O’Reilly also claimed to have been outside the Florida home of George de Mohrenschildt where he said that he heard the shotgun blast that marked his suicide. De Mohrenschildt was an associate of Lee Harvey Oswald and was scheduled to testify at a congressional hearing on the JFK assassination. However, a recording of a contemporaneous phone call shows that O’Reilly wasn’t even in Florida when de Mohrenschildt died.

THREE: On another occasion, O’Reilly told a story about how he “saw nuns get shot in the back of the head” in El Salvador. That also was not true and O’Reilly himself admitted it in a statement that said he had actually just seen some “images of violence” but did not witness the incidents himself. Oddly, while admitting that his original assertions were false, he neither apologized nor acknowledged any wrongdoing.

FOUR: This was a similar case where O’Reilly spoke of his visit to Northern Ireland. While there he claimed to have witnessed bombings, however, when challenged Fox News issued a statement similar to the one about El Salvador that said he had merely seen pictures.

FIVE: Then there was the time that O’Reilly was covering the riots in Los Angeles sparked by the acquittal of the police officers who beat Rodney King. He claimed to have been the target of attacks by rioters, however, his associates covering the story deny that any of them were assaulted or injured. They do, however, contend that some tensions flared due to O’Reilly being an asshole.

These fabrications by the guy who pretends to be running a “No Spin Zone” are hardly the only times he has lied. There have been numerous other episodes including bragging about winning two Peabody Awards (he didn’t), and claiming to be a registered Independent (he was a Republican for several years at the time).

Some other incidents may not have been lies technically, just horribly wrong statements that he refused to correct. For instance, he once argued that there were no homeless veterans in America; as proof that his boycott of France was working he offered a report by the “Paris Business Review,” which does not exist; and he insisted, after doing extensive research, that no one on Fox ever said that people who didn’t pay ObamaCare penalties would be subject to prison. PolitiFact gave that one a “Pants on Fire.”

News Corpse Presents: The ALL NEW 2nd volume of
Fox Nation vs. Reality: The Fox News Cult of Ignorance.
Available now at Amazon.

After NBC suspended Brian Williams for six months for a single incident of embellishing his experiences in Iraq, it seems like a fair and balanced review of O’Reilly’s behavior would net him a suspension of two or three years. Of course, Fox News does not generally hold itself to the standards of journalistic ethics to which real news enterprises adhere. Nevertheless, O’Reilly and Fox News should not be allowed to sweep these fibs under the floorboards. They must be forced to correct the record, submit to punishment, apologize to their audience as well as to those whose valor they stole, and make a good faith effort to ensure that it does not happen again.

Short of that, we must make sure that the truth is disseminated widely and continues to be raised whenever Fox or O’Reilly seek the trust of the public they are so badly abusing. If they don’t atone in some manner for their misdeeds, then news consumers must be reminded continuously that Fox News and Bill O’Reilly are charlatans that cannot be trusted to tell the truth. So keep the pressure on and let any advertisers know that you don’t appreciate them supporting unabashed liars.


15 thoughts on “Bill O’Reilly’s Cavalcade Of Lies: A Handy Collection Of The Damage – So Far

  1. Link posted to all of Monday’s related threads on MMFA at 2am CST Tuesday with the tease “summary of O’Reilly’s lies.”

  2. Yeah, but are they still really lies if you can get thousands of people to believe them? Because I don’t think Bill O’Reilly is the only person on Fox that I’ve heard telling lies.

    • No, it’s just that Bill-O isn’t even bothering to explain — or apologize for — his lies – he just goes on the attack. Then, he tells more lies to hide the original ones. Pathetic, really…

  3. Of course there will be no repercussions. Brian Williams bit the biscuit because his viewership expects him to be truthful. No one-not even the Fox Zombies-expects that of OReally. Everyone knows he’s a big, mean, dumb asshat, and that’s why his viewers love him. They see themselves in him. He’ll be even more successful because of this.
    “Standards….” Oh, that’s precious…….

  4. A lie told often enough becomes the truth. (Lenin)

  5. Remember the Paris Business Review debacle? Nothing new here. O’Reilly oh liely. The cynical leading the gullible. The day Fox tells the truth…that would be real news.

  6. I applaud your desire to restore fact and objectivity to journalism, truly, and O’Reilly has to be taken to task. But what are the numbers of American dupes preferentially watching Faux Newz (I know it’s above 50%; is it actually up to 70%?) So what I’m left with is—the average American has been dumbed-down to the point of not being able to distinguish fact from fiction, and perhaps worse doesn’t care!

    The Rolling Stone (Steve Daly) did an excellent opëd on the tragedy perpetrated on Brian Williams. It makes intelligent reading, for those of us to can still read, and actually care.

  7. As an add to your point five concerning O’Reilly’s claims about the danger he faced in covering the 1992 riots in LA following the Rodney King verdict, I note that O’Reilly told an interviewer in 2006 that he was “covering the L.A. riots (for Inside Edition), on the corner of Normandy [sic] and Vermont, right in the middle of it. They were throwing bricks and stones at us.”

    Any resident of my town will tell you that Normandie and Vermont are two north-south avenues about a half mile apart in Los Angeles, running south from the Los Feliz Hills through South Central LA down to the South Bay. There is no “corner of Normandie and Vermont.”

    As Captain Dudley Smith said in LA Confidential (1997):

    Go back to Jersey, sonny. This is the City of the Angels, and you haven’t got any wings.

  8. Fox and their lying minions have brought this country to a new low for journalism.

Comments are closed.