Zimmerman Defense Lawyer Makes Callous Attempt At Comedy

In one of the most stunningly idiotic opening statements ever presented in a court of law, Don West, co-counsel for the defense of George Zimmerman, somehow managed to conclude that it would be appropriate to tell a knock-knock joke at the commencement of a murder trial with the parents of the deceased teenage victim sitting a few feet away (video below). West prefaced his turn at comedy by saying that “Sometimes it is necessary to laugh to keep from crying.” This was obviously not one of those times as West proceeded to strike out with the stunned jury.

West: Knock knock. Who’s there? George Zimmerman. George Zimmerman who? All right. Good. You’re on the Jury.

George Zimmerman
Be Sure To “LIKE” News Corpse On Facebook

The only plausible explanation for this severe mental aberration is that the defense is already trying to set up a cause for appeal based on incompetent counsel. The jury sat in such abject silence after the alleged joke that West beseeched them for a response pleading “Nothing?” Then, after a break, the lawyer returned to continue his opening remarks, but started off with an apology and blaming his delivery for the lack of comedic punch.

That apology is further evidence that West has no idea what was wrong with his tasteless behavior. This was not a problem resulting from the joke not being funny enough, or that it was delivered poorly. The problem was that it was a joke. The problem was that a murder trial is not the same as open mike night the Laugh Factory.

What’s worse is that the point of this particular joke is an overt insult to the members of the jury. It was a slap at the ignorance of the panel for their having been selected based on how little they knew about current events. He was telling the jury that they were sitting in this courtroom because they are a bunch of morons who never heard of a notorious criminal defendant.

That’s not exactly the best way to win over an audience. It’s probably premature to presume that this counsel has permanently lost credibility with the jury, but he certainly has dug himself a deep hole that will take considerable effort to climb out of. If this flub signals anything, it’s that the defense has very little of substance to hang their case on, so from the outset they are throwing up irrelevancies and distractions. Look for more of that in the coming weeks.


10 thoughts on “Zimmerman Defense Lawyer Makes Callous Attempt At Comedy

  1. I guess I’m callous – it made me laugh out loud!

    • I don’t think you need to guess. You are.

  2. For once, I agree with Mark. This was a stunningly stupid way to start a defense argumant. West needs to stick to two facts. 1) Zimmerman’s nose was broken. 2) He also had deep gashes on the back of his neck.

    • I’m guessing West won’t mention Fact #3, that Martin had none of Zimmerman’s DNA anywhere on his body.

      • Actually, Scott’s two “facts” are not factual.

        Zimmerman had a bloody nose, but it was not broken. And he had a few very shallow cuts on his head (not his neck), that were not consistent with his story of having had his head bashed repeatedly onto concrete.

        • Wrong and wrong. And just how did he get a bloody nose? Was he picking it?

    • Oh! Well then, I guess that totally justifies shooting someone. :-\

  3. or the fact zimmerman was told not to approach martin, yet did otherwise. A$$hole

  4. Well, the jury can be sure of one thing. There HAS been a murder here; the lawyer just murdered good taste.

  5. 863997 614159Would enjoy to constantly get updated excellent internet weblog ! . 327998

Comments are closed.