Glenn Beck Has Seen The Finger Of God

As his tenure at Fox News winds to a close, Glenn Beck’s Messianic delusions are escalating beyond imagination.

Beck has long seen himself as the Lord’s messenger. After visiting the Vatican last year he returned with a story of a mysterious man who told him that “we know who you are. What you’re doing is wildly important.” He later told his radio congregation that “God is giving a plan, I think, to me that is not really a plan.” Whatever that means.

Today Beck revealed another encounter with the Almighty:


“I’m going to invite you to join me on a journey that will be recorded in the annals of history. It will be recorded and remembered. […] You are going to see miracles in your lifetime. I believe I have seen the finger of God. I believe that in the coming days you will see the entire of arm of God.”

The entire arm? All the way to the pit? Somehow I think it’s more likely that God is going to reveal his foot to Beck’s ass. However, I do believe that God has given Beck the finger. In fact, God has smited him mightily just as the Bible says. The signs are clear and cannot be ignored. God is pissed! He has said so unambiguously. Deuteronomy 28:27-29, describes the punishment from the Lord if you should fail to follow his laws:

27: The LORD will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods, and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed.
28: The LORD shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart.
29: And thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness, and thou shalt not prosper in thy ways: and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore, and no man shall save thee.

We hardly need to speak of Egypt and how badly Beck botched that. The emerods (or hemorrhoids) he has already had, and it nearly killed him. The potential blindness he announced tearfully last year. The madness is self evident. Even his prosperity is being plundered as his television program signs off and numerous radio stations have canceled his show.

Despite the Lord’s pleading and obvious signs, Beck has persisted in his evil ways, forcing God to resort to a vulgarity that every human ought to understand. When God flips you the bird, you should take notice. But Beck is probably too blinded by his own divine Narcissism that this too will go right over his head.

Find us on Google+
Advertisement:

Megyn Kelly and Fox News Helped Sen. Ensign Cover-Up His Crimes

Nevada Senator John Ensign resigned from the Senate last week, but his troubles may not end there. The New York Times is reporting that the results of a Senate Ethics Committee investigation may leave Ensign liable for charges of obstructing an FEC investigation, violating federal lobbying bans, and making unlawful payments to the husband of his congressional aide with whom he was having an affair – among other things.

However, any investigation of this matter needs to include possible interference on the part of Fox News and Glenn Beck-wannabe, Megyn Kelly. There is evidence that Kelly, who received a letter from Doug Hampton revealing Ensign’s infidelity, warned Ensign that the news was about to come out rather than reporting on it. As I wrote on June 19, 2009:

“Fox News knew of Ensign’s infidelity five days before Ensign came forward. They got the information from the husband of Ensign’s mistress. That’s a pretty good source, especially when he asserts that he had corroborating evidence.”

First Fox denied having received any letter. Then they admitted that they had received the letter a day before the news broke. Then a FedEx receipt revealed that they had received the letter three days earlier. And Fox broadcast no stories about the Ensign affair during any of that time, or even for several days after.

When Ensign came forward to confess his sins, he told the press that he was doing so because the story was about to come out in the media. So the question is: did he learn that from Megyn Kelly?

The evidence strongly suggests that Kelly tipped Ensign off and set the stage for his announcement. Then she and Fox kept the story quiet in the days that followed. That is not the behavior of a “news” network. It is the behavior of an accomplice.

[Update 5/16/11] The Senate Ethics Committee report suggests former senator (and current GOP presidential candidate) Rick Santorum may have played a role in tipping off Ensign. If true, that does not mean that Kelly didn’t also give a head’s up to Ensign. And it certainly doesn’t explain the changing stories about when she received Hampton’s letter.

There is also the matter of Ensign’s reason for going public (that he was told that the media was going to break the news of the affair). That’s an alert that is more likely to come from Kelly (a Fox anchor) than from Santorum (a former senate colleague). However, it should be noted that Santorum was also a Fox News contributor at the time he is alleged to have tipped off Ensign. So Fox is entangled in this business no matter what.


Jon Stewart Slams Fox News’ Commotion Over Common

It’s been a few days since Fox News had some ridiculously irrelevant, phony scandal to trump up over President Obama. With the release of the birth certificate and Osama Bin Laden being lost at sea, Fox was running out of distractions to the wildly unpopular GOP proposal to end Medicare and Obama’s rising poll ratings. Lucky for them Michelle Obama provided an opening by inviting rapper Common to a White House event promoting poetry to children.

The ensuing controversy was built on a thoroughly dishonest representation of the lyrics to a Common rhyme from 2007. In typical fashion, Fox Breitbarted Common by truncating his words. The allegedly violent verse that outraged everyone at Fox was really just a poetic description of reality in some communities that ended with this call for peace:

“No time for that cause there’s things to be done. Stay true to what I do so the youth dream come.”

That, however, didn’t stop Fox from riling up their gullible audience with a campaign to elicit fear of this African-American artist and to transfer that fear to the President. You know, the Halfrican Marxist from Kenya. Fox Nation posted eight separate stories on this subject. It is clearly more important to them than the economy, the war on terror, or even Newt Gingrich’s ill-fated presidential campaign.


Thank goodness for Jon Stewart who, once again, managed to put this nonsense in perspective by demonstrating the hypocrisy of Fox and the other hyperventilating martinets of virtue.

Jon Stewart’s Tone Def Poetry Jam Part 1:

Jon Stewart’s Tone Def Poetry Jam Part 2:

Maybe now we can get back to the truly important issues like Bristol Palin’s plastic surgery.

[Update] The Fox Nationalists posted two more stories about Common this morning, for a total of ten to date. In the same time frame Fox Nation posted one (that’s 1) story about the disastrous flooding on the Mississippi. Says something about their priorities, doesn’t it?


FOX News Invents Another George Soros Conspiracy

On the Fox News web site today, Dan Gainor, a VP at the ultra-conservative Media Research Center, wrote an op-ed that asked, “Why Don’t We Hear About Soros’ Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations?” The answer, as it turns out, is because there aren’t any such ties. In the opening paragraph Gainor writes that Soros…

“…has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.”

Then Gainor fails to provide a single piece of evidence that Soros is connected to any of those enterprises. The article is a hodge-podge of guilt-by-association assertions that are held together by the thinnest of threads.

Rather than support his headlined accusation, Gainor offers as examples of Soros’ omnipotent influence the fact that he has donated to a few independent, non-profit institutions that focus on journalism. The organizations he chose to pick on are ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity, and the Center for Investigative Reporting. These groups have indeed received donations from Soros, as well as many other donors. Soros has no executive control of any of them. But more to the point, these groups hardly qualify as being “major news organizations.”

Gainor’s problem with these groups, other than that they were beneficiaries of Soros’ generosity, is that they have some working journalists serving as board members or advisors. Perhaps Gainor would prefer that media foundations put more banking and oil executives on their boards. The wild-eyed players that Gainor is so disturbed by include rabid partisans like David Gergen and Christiane Amanpour. And, again, Soros has no influence over these individuals or whether they accept invitations to serve on foundation boards.

Gainor has utterly failed to support his thesis. Not only does Soros have no control over these organizations, but they aren’t even the big media powers Gainor describes them as. However, Gainor’s column appeared on the web site of a bona fide major news organization: Fox News. And the owner of Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, also has control over an empire of media enterprises including the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, Dow Jones NewsWire, and BSkyB, Europe’s biggest satellite television provider. What’s more, Murdoch is also on the board of directors of the Associated Press, another bona fide big media player.

Finally, it should be noted that Gainor’s own employer, the Media Research Center, is funded by foundations run by right-wing media baron Richard Mellon Scaife. It is also closely tied to Murdoch’s Fox News. When former Fox anchor and managing editor, Brit Hume, accepted an award from the MRC, he thanked them

“…for the tremendous amount of material that the Media Research Center provided me for so many years when I was anchoring Special Report, I don’t know what we would’ve done without them. It was a daily buffet of material to work from, and we certainly made tremendous use of it.”

So, as usual, the allegations levied by the right turn out to be the very same improprieties they are guilty of themselves. Some things never change.

[Update] Media Matters reveals that Dan Gainor is “the Boone Pickens Fellow” for MRC, and that Pickens himself is an MRC trustee. Pickens is also a major player in the natural gas industry, which ProPublica has reported on and exposed for its grim environmental record. Funny that Fox News failed to disclose the conflict of interest in which Gainor is engaging by attacking ProPublica for its coverage of Pickens’ business.

Also, Glenn Beck referenced this article on his television program today and completely misstated its contents. He said that Soros funds ABC, CBS, and the Koch brothers. Not only is that not what the article says, it’s downright insane. Or in other words, typical Beck.


Phillip Morris CEO To Become New Al Qaeda Chief?

At their annual shareholder’s meeting in New York, Phillip Morris CEO, Louis C. Camilleri, spoke about the addictive nature of cigarettes and the obstacles to quitting. He said…

“We take our responsibility very seriously, and I don’t think we get enough recognition for the efforts we make to ensure that there is effective worldwide regulation of a product that is harmful and that is addictive. Nevertheless, whilst it is addictive, it is not that hard to quit. … There are more previous smokers in America today than current smokers.”

Wow! This guy could be a Fox News anchor with his championship skills at lying. Let’s address them one at a time.

  1. Phillip Morris has opposed every effort to regulate tobacco products that has ever come up, particularly the effective regulations.
  2. Why should he get recognition for selling a product he admits is harmful and addictive? It’s like a crack dealer asking for more recognition.
  3. It’s not that hard to quit? Studies have shown that cigarettes are harder to quit than heroin.
  4. There are NOT more previous smokers in America today than current smokers (see below). But there are more DEAD smokers in America today than current smokers.

Smoking kills over 400,000 Americans every year, and 5 million worldwide. There are presently estimated to be about 46 million smokers in the United States. According to the Lung Association there are only 36 million former smokers. And that doesn’t count those who are no longer smoking because they are no longer breathing.

But the most despicable part of Camilleri’s remarks is the contention that “it is not that hard to quit.” The only purpose for promoting that lie is to entice people who don’t currently smoke to do so, and to dissuade smokers from quitting. After all, you can do that any old time with hardly any effort. Never mind that cigarettes are harmful and addictive, they are easy to set aside should you ever choose to do so.

Now that Osama Bin Laden has been “retired” from the executive position at Al Qaeda, there has been some talk of who will succeed him. If they are looking for someone who has no qualms about killing people in mass quantities, they ought to consider Camilleri. His casualty count far surpasses that of Bin Laden, an amateur by comparison. He appears to have little or no conscience. He doesn’t mind being responsible for the exploding death rate of American citizens. And he just might be able to help them turn a profit.


The Liberal Plot To Ban Access To Guns

A new proposal has been introduced in the South Dakota state legislature that would upend the Constitutionally protected right to bear arms. This complex and insidious scheme, if enacted, would virtually eliminate access to guns by law abiding citizens. Here are the hoops that the legislation would require honest South Dakotans to jump through:

  • Before being granted a permit, the purchaser would be required to listen to a legislature-written lecture on gun violence.
  • There would then be a 24 hour waiting period.
  • On returning to the permit office, there would be a mandatory viewing of photos and films of gun violence.
  • The purchaser would then have to visit a state-accredited weapons training center.
  • Then return to the permit office where there would be another lecture about the dangers of guns.
  • Then another two hour wait before a permit would be issued.

This process is grossly unfair and serves only to make access to guns unnecessarily difficult. What makes it even worse is that there are presently no state-accredited weapons training centers as stipulated in the law, so the conditions required for acquiring a permit are actually impossible to meet. This has the effect of making gun ownership itself impossible.

This would be an outrageous violation of the Constitution’s second amendment except for one thing: none of it is true. At least insofar as guns are concerned. However, another Constitutionally protected right is being violated in South Dakota in precisely the same way:

  • Before an abortion can be performed the patient would be required to listen to a legislature-written lecture on abortion.
  • There would then be a 24 hour waiting period.
  • On returning to the doctor’s office, there would be a mandatory viewing of a sonogram.
  • The patient would then have to visit a state-accredited crisis pregnancy counseling center.
  • Then return to the doctor’s office where there would be another lecture about alleged health dangers of abortion.
  • Then another two hour wait before the abortion could be performed.

And of course, there really are no state-accredited crisis pregnancy counseling centers in South Dakota, so the conditions required for getting an abortion are actually impossible to meet.

What I have to wonder is how these extremist Christian conservatives can lay claim to a philosophy of small government? How can they profess to desire a state that is prohibited from interfering in the private lives of citizens, especially when it violates their rights? How can they assert these principles when it comes to gun ownership, but completely abandon them when it comes to the most private medical decisions?

Is it just because men, for the most part, want their guns to play with, and are trusted to use them responsibly, but women cannot be trusted to make decisions about their own bodies?

Find us on Google+
Advertisement:

Obama Hooks Rupert Murdoch Into Immigration Debate

In a speech in El Paso, TX, today, Barack Obama presented his case for making comprehensive immigration reform a priority. In the course of his presentation he shined a spotlight on a prominent immigration activist with whom he has little else in common.

Obama: Already, there is a growing coalition of leaders across America who don’t always see eye-to-eye, but who are coming together on this issue. They see the harmful consequences of this broken system for their businesses and communities. They understand why we need to act.

There are Democrats and Republicans, including former-Republican Senator Mel Martinez and former-Bush administration Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff; leaders like Mayor Michael Bloomberg; evangelical ministers like Leith Anderson and Bill Hybels; police chiefs from across the nation; educators and advocates; labor unions and chambers of commerce; small business owners and Fortune 500 CEOs. One CEO had this to say about reform. “American ingenuity is a product of the openness and diversity of this society… Immigrants have made America great as the world leader in business, science, higher education and innovation.” That’s Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, and an immigrant himself. I don’t know if you’re familiar with his views, but let’s just say he doesn’t have an Obama bumper sticker on his car.

Brilliant move. By roping Murdoch into the discussion, opponents of reform will be put in the position of disparaging their media patron if they criticize the policy of which Murdoch has been a vocal proponent. It makes things particularly touchy for Fox News anchors and contributors who will be challenged to advance their racist agenda without offending their boss. Not that they wouldn’t try to separate themselves from Papa Murdoch. They have in the past been notoriously disobedient with regard to Climate Change, which Murdoch regards as a serious problem, but Fox News regards as a hoax. But every time they wander off in this manner they widen the hypocrisy gap a little further.


Jonah Goldberg: In A Hurry To Prove He’s An Idiot

Conservative douchebags have been outdoing themselves since President Obama successfully executed the mission that put an end to Osama Bin Laden. They have speculated as to whether Bin Laden is really dead. They have griped over whether Bin Laden’s death photo should be released. They have struggled mightily to deny Obama any credit for the mission, while slathering admiration on George W. Bush and his phalanx of ineffectual torturers.

That they are jealous and cowed is unmistakable. Yet somehow there is always one miscreant that manages to stretch the boundaries of the lunatic fringe. Today it is Jonah Goldberg.

In an article published by the Los Angeles Times (to their eternal shame), Goldberg boldly accuses Obama of having made a tactical error by rushing to announce that Bin Laden was dead. The headline blared: “Why the hurry to gloat about Bin Laden?” And early in the piece Goldberg makes an obvious confession:

I’m no expert on such matters – though I’ve talked to several about this – but even a casual World War II buff can understand that the shelf life of actionable intelligence would be extended if we hadn’t told the whole world, and Al Qaeda in particular, that we had it.

Goldberg’s thesis is that the President should have waited a week or two to give the military and intelligence communities more time to exploit that information before Bin Laden’s associates knew what had happened.

What a dolt! First of all let’s set aside the obvious. If Obama had delayed the Bin Laden announcement every winger to the right of Reagan’s ghost would have been furious that he withheld such vital information from the American people. Goldberg would have been amongst the first to complain that Obama was running a clandestine regime that ruled by keeping people in the dark and lying about its actions.

More substantively, Goldberg seems to think that the Bin Laden mission was conducted quietly with stealthy commandos tiptoeing into the compound, smothering him with a pillow, and sneaking out again. Of course, that isn’t exactly how it went down. Multiple helicopters roared into the urban neighborhood (one of them crashed and was blown up), the Navy SEALS barged into the compound with guns blazing, and after a tumultuous racket Bin Laden was disposed of and the team departed on their helicopter caravan. And all of this happened in the middle of a densely populated city.

Does Goldberg think that this sort of mission could have been covered up? Does he think that all of the neighbors, many of whom were Pakistani military, slept though the conflagration? Does think that the Pakistanis, whom most people believe knew of Bin Laden’s residence, would have scratched their heads and wondered what all the commotion was about? Is he so stupid that he is unaware that Bin Laden’s associates nearby were probably already warning one another before the choppers had crossed back into Afghanistan?

Let’s face it…ten minutes didn’t go by after the the raid before everyone in the vicinity knew exactly what had happened and to whom. The only reason Goldberg raises this complaint is to try to use it to bash the President. His theory makes no sense whatsoever, so it’s only purpose is for it to be a hit piece.

Unfortunately for Goldberg, he swings and misses and just makes an imbecile of himself. Fortunately for Goldberg, he must be used to that by now.


Glenn Beck’s Hate For Youth Is Good For Business

Glenn Beck has a long history of denigrating young Americans. He has called them “useful idiots.” He has disparaged them as gullible waifs subject to indoctrination. When Al Gore told a young audience that they know more about some things than their parents, Beck ridiculed the notion as an assault on parenthood.

On Friday’s show Beck populated his studio with a congregation of alleged teachers. The purpose of these humanoid props was to serve as the backdrop for his sermon on the evils of unions and the stupidity of America’s children. In support of that message, Beck began with a citation from a survey on civics education by the National Conference on Citizenship (NCOC):

Beck: A report out this week that only 22% of eighth graders passed a basic civics test in the country. The conclusion? Millions of young Americans will be unprepared to be informed and engaged that a healthy citizenry, healthy democracy requires.

It’s true that a lack of understanding about the mechanics of our government is troubling, but Beck’s approach to this information is shallow and insulting. First of all, he implies that this is a new development, probably caused by our progressive, Marxist, alien president, and his teacher’s union thugs. But these results are almost identical to studies by the NCOC dating back to 1998. Beck also implies that this is unique to kids when adults in similar studies fare just as poorly.

What Beck fails to grasp is that there are millions of young people who are actively engaged in the affairs of their communities and their country. Just because they don’t correctly recall precisely how many amendments to the Constitution there are (an actual question in the survey), doesn’t mean they are ignorant or passive about important issues that touch their lives every day.

Beck himself contradicts his assertion that kids are apathetic dolts by rattling off a litany of events where young people have taken direct action to impact their world. However, he portrays these actions as reckless and insubordinate. For instance, he reprimands some Girl Scouts who protest certain processes in the production of their famous cookies because they contribute to destroying the Rain Forest and killing endangered species like orangutans. To this Beck responds “Keep killing the orangutans, the cookies are yummy.”

Then Beck complained about high school students in Tucson, Arizona who protested the cancellation of Mexican-American studies classes. He said that the classes taught students to overthrow the U.S. government and advocated returning states to Mexico. Needless to say, none of that was true.

Beck also criticized a group of young environmentalists who are taking action to protect the environment for their future. The folks behind the I Matter March are an inspirational collection of young people who are genuinely concerned about the destruction of the planet that they are going to inherit – and they are doing something about it. But to Beck this is an ominous sign of doom.

Beck: Out in California groups of teens are now suing the government for not protecting the earth. And they’re planning marches across the globe. They wrote on their web site ‘Our Climate, Our Future, Our Revolution.’ They say quote ‘Youth have the moral authority and the legal right, as the generation most affected by the climate crisis, to demand that our governments protect the atmosphere for our future.’ unquote.

To Beck, these are all examples of the decadent state of America’s youth. In Beck’s eyes. there is no way they can win. If they stand by idly they are aimless and without principles. If the act on their principles they are pawns of the defilers of all that is good in society. Beck warns that schools, which “used to teach discipline and respect for authority,” have become cauldrons of moral depravity.

Beck: Our children are not only being short-changed, they’re being turned into, I think, slaves eventually.

It’s ironic that Beck regards motivated, self-reliant youth to be on the verge of servitude, while pushing his own prescription of discipline and respect for authority. It’s an Orwellian recipe that boils down to this: Free Thought = Slavery. Blind Obedience = Freedom.

To further support his contention that kids are dopes, Beck grossly misrepresents information he sloppily copied from the Internet. His disdain for teachers is revealed by how poorly he conducts simple research. Perhaps this alcoholic, drug-addicted, dropout should have paid more attention when he was in school.

Beck falsely claims that after the news broke about Osama Bin Laden, the #5 search on Google was “Who dat?” (as in “Who is Osama Bin Laden”). Actually, it was the #5 search on Yahoo, not Google. He also said that 25% of searches overall were from those under 24. This, he said, means that “kids growing up today don’t know who the most wanted man in the world is.” But those overall searches were not asking just “who is” Bin Laden, but anything to do with him and the breaking news of his death. It was mostly people who knew who Bin Laden was and were seeking more information about the startling news that was just released.

Beck is going to great lengths to slander the integrity of America’s youth. He has an obvious disgust for the entire generation that is likely based on his assessment of himself at that age. I’m quite sure he was just as repulsive as the picture he is trying to paint of today’s young people. But these repeated assaults are more revealing of his own character (or lack thereof), than of his targets.

Shortly after he announced that he would be “transitioning off” of his Fox News television program, Beck told his TV audience that the reason he was leaving was because he wanted to “get to the youth.” He later told a live audience in Albany, New York that he intended to build a way to “deliver news directly to the youth of America.” But if this is how he plans to do it, he is going to fail miserably.

Beck’s fan base has always been the curmudgeon community. He preaches relentlessly of a gloomy future that encompasses the end of America and the forsaking of decency and values. He embraces an idealized fantasy of the past and the icons of an analog world that appeal to an elderly demographic (see the blackboards and antique TVs and other vintage props that grace his set).


Consequently, his disdain for youth is consistent with his target audience and his marketing profile. For Glenn Beck, hating young people is most definitely good for business. And what’s good for business is Beck’s first priority.

[Update 5/13/11] Beck made another proclamation of his intention to target a youth audience after leaving Fox. He told an in-studio audience of college students that…

“I am leaving Fox because if we lose your generation, we lose. And I have to concentrate on your generation. So I’m asking you, if you’re in college now, you stay in touch with as many people as you can, and then you tell us what you need. Because we’re working on some things so that when you come back in the Fall [unintelligible] gonna smoke ’em out.”

If Beck follows through on this, expect a barrage of phony, Breitbart-inspired videos slandering teachers and curriculum as Godless Socialism. He doesn’t care about young people or free expression in academia. He only cares about advancing his theocratic, rightist agenda and fattening his wallet.


Fox Nation Lies And Lies

It is important to be accurate here. Fox Nation obviously spins stories to advance the ultra-rightist fairy tales they present as “news.” But they also engage in overt, blatant lying, not mistakes or differences opinions, but outrageous, unambiguous lies. Here are a couple of examples from this morning:


GE’s Immelt Surrenders on Climate
No he doesn’t. The article, sourced to the science deniers at the Fox-affiliated web site, JunkScience, brazenly misrepresents remarks by Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of GE. What Immelt said was that he had some regret that his prior focus on green technology was misinterpreted by critics as downplaying other priorities such as job creation and general business goals. In the article he expressly affirmed his support for Climate Change science and said that GE’s businesses in this area will create between 10 and 15 million jobs. He also said that those businesses will generate $21 billion in revenue this year. That hardly sounds like surrender.

NPR Caught Abusing Taxpayer $
No they weren’t. There was absolutely nothing in this article, sourced to the right-wing Daily Caller, that even remotely suggested abuse of any kind. The Fox Nationalists made it up from scratch. It was an article about NPR’s use of lobbyists to help them preserve the congressional funding that has been under attack since the release of phony sting videos by criminal videographer James O’Keefe. (Those videos, which were published by the Daily Caller, were subsequently proven to have been deliberately edited to create a false impression.) If the Fox Nationalists are implying that any use of lobbyists is inherently abuse, then they are accusing a lot of their pals of being corrupt.

It may seem futile to point to yet another example of Fox News being purposefully dishonest, but the need to be vigilant does not wane just because this band of liars are so prolific. The more we can demonstrate that Fox does not deserve to be believed the better chance we have of altering their behavior and preventing their distortions from taking hold.